Alfredo Jalife-Rahme
P
By chance, the historic fall of Bakhmut – for the Russians Artemovsk – was staged almost in sync on the same day with the ineffectiveness of the depressed G-7 in Hiroshima – where the US launched, in addition to Nagasaki, its lethal nuclear bombs on two towns civilians, which Kishida’s new Japanese war government forgot.
Retired US Air Force Lieutenant Colonel and former Pentagon analyst Karen Kwiatkowski agreed that the kyiv’s political leadership strategy failed
while the Russian success is important practically and symbolically
.
The colonel describes the aberrant behavior of Zelensky, who acts like he doesn’t understand the reality of the situation
.
He concludes that Zelensky is no longer useful to Ukraine or the West (https://bit.ly/433UP6o).
The Khazarian Comedian (https://amzn.to/2MR0PfM) Zelensky has already become a living corpse, on the verge of killing in several European and Asian capitals, unable to return to his bunker in Kiev, after having failed in his assassination attempt on Tsar Vlady Putin, who surely has a lethal surprise for him. reserved.
For the renowned UN weapons consultant, the American Scott Ritter, Bakhmut represents a new stalingrad
–where USSR forces trapped the Nazi army in World War II, which was decisive in the defeat of the Hitler regime.
According to Global Times de China, el triunfo de Rusia en Bakhmut/Artemovsk helps you gain a significant advantage in politics
e greatly boosts the morale of Russian soldiers
.
For Zhang Hong, from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the battle of Bakhmut has symbolic and practical significance
–as the American colonel commented (https://bit.ly/43rmuOJ).
NBC News, very close to the US military, exposed that the fall of Bakhmut means a strong blow to Ukraine, while Zhang explained that today Russia maintains a military advantage against Ukraine, although the West continues to use Ukraine as its proxy with increasing military supply in order to weaken Russia.
. Zhang added that Zelensky’s presence at the G-7 summit in Hiroshima indicates that the West seeks to end war through the use of war
which will lead to further escalation and complicate the situation.
Zelensky went to the G-7 in Hiroshima to get his new F-16 air toys to drive Russia out of Crimea first and then Donbas/Lugansk, as if Moscow didn’t possess Sukhoi Su- 57, considered the best military aircraft in the world, and with excellent trained pilots (which is not the case with the most primitive Ukrainian pilots), not to mention its endowment of miraculous hypersonic missiles.
The New York Times – very close to Obama/Biden/the Clintons and the neoliberal globalist mega-speculator George Soros – confessed that the G-7 summit in Hiroshima condensed a disliked leaders club
when the Relatively weak approval ratings for President Biden and his caucus of seven partners highlight the fragility (megasic!) of free (sic) societies confronting deep political divisions
(https://bit.ly/3BTJhXI).
We always establish it: the G-7, with its two members of the European Union, sin not only of patent unpopularity, which makes them illegitimate, but, even worse, of blatant ungovernability. The G-7 in frank decline in the face of the dazzling BRICS condenses the caquistocracy (the government of the worst) in which the nihilistic neoliberal globalism and its macabre alchemical financialism derived.
It is enough to compare the unpopularity/illegitimacy of the G-7, with its two European aggregates, against the astonishing popularity of the Russian Putin, the Indian Narendra Modi and the Mexican López Obrador, with 80 percent more or less acceptance.
Could it be that the unpopular leaders of the G-7 and their two European attachés seek confrontation against Russia and China (https://bit.ly/3WuPe6G) in order to get false patriotic support?
source the day
