Home » today » World » Quebec cites dubious sources to justify the curfew

Quebec cites dubious sources to justify the curfew

In a press release released on Thursday (New window), the Ministry of Health and Social Services cites four studies which, according to him, demonstrate the effects and effectiveness of a curfew. The release of this press release followed the press conference during which the tightening of health restrictions in Quebec was announced.

During the press conference, Prime Minister François Legault mentioned some indications according to which the curfew could have a beneficial effect on the epidemiological situation. He had also invoked a matter of common sense, although Quebec is currently the only place in North America and one of the few places in the world to resort to such a measure in the face of the generalized rise of the Omicron variant.

the Ministry of Health and Social Services had previously admitted not having himself conducted a study on the effects of the measure imposed on Quebec from January to May 2021.

A intellectual fraud

Among the studies cited Thursday by the Ministry of Health and Social Services, two were carried out in France, one in Ontario and another in Jordan.

The latter was published in the journal Frontiers in Public Health, whose publisher, Frontiers, is named in Beall’s list of potentially predatory journals and publishers (New window), a benchmark in the field.

Predatory publishers claim to publish open access journals in a legitimate way, while their peer review practices are questionable, and quality control is inadequate, can we read on the website of the libraries of the University of Montreal.

These predatory journals and publishers constitute a large-scale and extremely serious intellectual fraud, according to the philosopher and essayist Normand Baillargeon, known for his writings on critical thinking.

We give ourselves the appearances of credibility, he continues in a telephone interview, which can confuse the general public and even some researchers, but it is a process which is equivalent to pseudo-science.

During Thursday’s press conference, Prime Minister François Legault invoked “common sense” to justify the imposition of a curfew in Quebec.

Photo : The Canadian Press / Graham Hughes

In the case of Frontiers, the publisher was included on the list amid allegations of misconduct during the peer review process in several of its journals, the Beall list website says. Some of them, for example, have not been removed from journal editorial boards. Frontiers despite their requests.

Julien Simard, postdoctoral researcher at the School of Social Work of McGill University, and Emma Jean, doctoral student in sociology at the University of Montreal, say they are MSSS may think that this article is credible “,” text “:” alarmed that the MSSS may think that this article is credible “}}”>alarmed that the Ministry of Health and Social Services may think this article is credible.

The author claims to establish the effectiveness of the Jordanian curfew through an international comparison with other countries in the Arab world, but he does not adjust his data to be comparable, for example, and taking into account screening capacities that differ greatly between countries, they denounce.

The methodology used is very rudimentary, to a point that makes the study unnecessary, they continue in an email after looking at the study cited by the Ministry of Health and Social Services at the request of Radio-Canada.

Asked about this by email, the Ministry of Health and Social Services had not responded to Radio-Canada’s requests regarding the reliability of the study at the time of publishing this text.

The relevance of other studies questioned

Julien Simard and Emma Jean themselves examined the impact of the first curfew in Quebec (New window), concluding in a post – which has not been peer reviewed – that a clear effect of the measure was not found.

The two academics also question the methodology or the relevance of the other studies cited by the Ministry of Health and Social Services Thursday.

As for the Ontario study, according to them, it suffers from several methodological weaknesses, in particular with regard to the transparency of the data and the basic assumptions. In addition, and although it dates from April, it has not yet been published, which indicates that the authors may have difficulty getting it published while showing us that it has not been reviewed by the scientific community, they continue.

The two French studies, peer-reviewed, published in serious journals and completely credible, according to the two researchers, clearly show a decrease in the number of cases and the reproduction rate (Rt) following the introduction of the curfew. However, what the two researchers observed in Quebec during the first curfew was a drop in these variables even before its imposition and a lack of effect thereafter.

Rt in relation to the curfew is practically non-existent in Quebec, it seems real in France “,” text “:” The reactivity of the Rt in relation to the curfew is practically non-existent in Quebec, it seems real in France “}}”>The responsiveness of reproduction rate in relation to the curfew is practically non-existent in Quebec, it seems real in France, they write.

Julien Simard and Emma Jean emphasize that it is difficult to isolate the effect of a measure such as a curfew from social behavior which itself varies according to several cultural, political, socioeconomic and probably also climatic factors, so that the conclusions from overseas would be difficult to apply in the Quebec context.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.