Prince Harry and Meghan Markle face criticism after launching new website and changing their children’s names.

Those who received criticism on the Day of Love and Friendship went to the Dukes of Sussex, Harry y Meghan Markle. And in the midst of the crisis that the British Royal Housemarked by Kate Middleton’s recovery process and the very recent announcement of the cancer suffered by King Charles III, the controversial couple not only launched his place websussex.com, but also announced with great fanfare that their two children, Archie y Lilibetthey will now have a ‘new name’.

The two little ones royalswho live next door to their parents in Montecito, California, They will now be called Archie and Lilibet Sussex, thus eliminating their ‘original’ surname, Mountbatten-Windsor. This decision would have been made since the accession of King Charles to the throne; However, it was not until February 13 that the new name of Harry and Meghan’s children was officially announced through their controversial website.

Given the multiple details of the Sussexes’ life that were revealed on their newly launched website, users around the world criticized the couple ‘to die’, as they claim that throw a rebranding of their personalities at this critical moment for the British royalty is, furthermore, insensitive and opportunistic.

Criticism rains down on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle after the launch of their new website. (Instagram: @duches_of_sussex)

You may be interested in: Strategy or bad judgment? Harry and Meghan launch new projects at a delicate time for the British Royal Family

In the face of criticism, this is what is known about the ‘new name’ of Harry and Meghan Markle’s children

The emblematic British newspaper, The Daily Mailwas who sparked controversy before the ‘new names’ of Archie and Lilibet. In the renovated site of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex you can glimpse the Sussex coat of arms, a situation that also generated a wave of negative comments, as they claim that this gesture is a betrayal of the promise Harry made to the late Elizabeth IIto maintain their original surnames despite their renunciation of the British crown.

Likewise, the name change of the little ones is due, according to the Sussexes, to an attempt to unify their family through a single surname. Sources close to Harry and Meghan said the relaunch is an attempt to unite the projects of Harry, 39, Meghan, 42, and their children, under the same general website. The use of Sussex is thought to be in keeping with how Harry was known while in the army.

“The reality behind the new site is very simple: it is a hub digital to show the work that the Sussexes do and reflects the fact that the family has, since the King’s coronation, the same surname for the first time. It represents their unification and is a moment of pride for them,” said the same source.

Did Prince Harry set conditions to visit his father, King Charles III, after learning of his cancer diagnosis?

The newspaper The Telegraph spoke with Petronella Wyat, a journalist close to the queen, and who assures that Harry and Queen Camilla now try to avoid any contact. “As I have heard, Harry preferred not to be in the same room as his stepmother. when he spoke to King Charles about his diagnosis,” the communicator explained.

Let us remember that in his book Spareand contrary to what was thought, Harry somewhat showed his dislike towards Camilla. In addition, she suggested that she was the one who could have leaked the family stories that were lived in the Buckingham Palace, just to reinforce their image. As if that were not enough, the prince called her ‘dangerous’ and ‘villainous’, and even hinted that she also sacrificed him so that her image would improve. Will it be her?

But as soon as the youngest son of the monarch found out about his father’s illness, he wanted to meet him at all costs. Although the meeting between the two lasted less than an hour, Prince Harry’s condition to be with King Charles makes sense. Above all because His Majesty had to take care of his pressure. “The monarch must keep his stress levels down and they didn’t want his blood pressure to go up for anything or anyone,” explained a royal expert for the newspaper. The Sun.

I like this:

I like Loading…