The Fair Room of the Federal Chamber of Resistance, Chaco, refused to enable the judicial fair to deal with an amparo action with which a user of a company prepaid medicine was trying to stop the high tariff derived from DNU 70/23 of the government of Javier Miley.
“There is no imminent circumstance that poses a risk, since the grievances are limited to pointing out the exorbitance of the fee to which it would amount without demonstrating or even alleging that its expiration would take place during the course of the fair – which, on the other hand, “It is close to completion,” the court held.
The affiliate had requested the authorization of the fair arguing that “with the repeal of the regime linked to prepaid medicine (with the repeal of price control guidelines and limits on the power to increase fees) possible and concrete damages were generated that “They clearly recognize in the action of protection and precautionary measures protection tools for the human rights involved.”
“The outright repeal of regulatory systems intended to fulfill the constitutional promise of leading a dignified life, clearly and concretely generates harm linked to the repeal of aspects of the legislation relating to prepaid medicine,” the legal action maintained.
The judges Rocío Alcalá and María Delfina Denogens They agreed that there were no reasons to enable the fair, but announced that they will give “preferential processing” to the proposal against the increase in prepaid medicine services “once the recess is over.”
