In the case of NGOs, however, the situation is different. – The positive discrimination of foreign-funded communities, which in the United States are often considered to be agent organizations or entities exercising political pressure, raises questions of sovereignty – pointed out jr. Zoltán Lomnici, who says that in this case the suspicion of personalized legislation may also arise, because
in its proposal for the creation of the new EU directive, the EP relies mostly on the rule of law reports prepared by NGOs.
Several suspects in the Brussels corruption scandal that erupted last December, such as Niccoló Figá-Talamanca and Antonio Panzeri, influenced the representatives of the European Parliament through non-governmental organizations, and it is suspected that with the help of NGOs they also laundered payments received from third countries for their lobbying activities. From this point of view, the EP’s proposal also raises questions.
Putting NGOs above law and justice could legalize their existing abuses above the legal norms of the community, and this new type of power could be suitable to legitimize certain forms of corruption.
– emphasized the expert.
Zoltán Lomnici Jr. also drew attention to the fact that various NGOs also play a major role in encouraging migration.
The network-like operation was also observed in terms of facilitating migration, so now the goal is clearly to ensure the “protection” of NGOs against legal and legal proceedings on a pan-European level, i.e. if possible in all member states
– said the expert.
The full article ITT readable.
