Written in SHOWS the
–
In recent days it became known that Matías Morla can use the image of Diego Maradona. Totally outraged with that resolution of Justice, Dalma Y Gianinna Maradona They used their social networks to download and launch themselves against whoever served as the former footballer’s lawyer for a long time.
It was Mauricio D´Alessandro, the defense lawyer of Matías Morla, who referred to the statement of the heiresses of El Diez. In this sense, in dialogue with Implacables, he said: “I read the statement and I cannot answer for two girls who, clearly, did not study law, and I believe that no university degree. They say anything in the statement. It is barbaric, it is a expression of desire, but it is made by people who have no legal knowledge. ”
“I’m not saying anything bad, but what it says there is impossible … I would have to answer them in a colloquial way and I don’t want to confront them or argue. I imagine they are upset by this failure, why am I going to work on that annoyance? “he said too.
In addition, Mauricio D´Alessandro He sentenced: “Hopefully they will agree with their aunts and resolve the issue, if it is easy enough. What is the reason why they have to continue fighting? It is the third time they have lost in court, but they released this statement because The third time’s the charm”.
¡King picante!
Source: (Relentless).
In the last hours Dalma Y Gianinna Maradona They shared a strong statement about Matías Morla and the ruling of the Justice that allows him to use the image of Diego Maradona. “We criminally denounce Matías Edgardo Morla because, as his lawyer and attorney-in-fact, we understand that he would have clearly defrauded our father by subtracting his trademarks from his patrimony, incorporating them into his through a legal entity,” stated Claudia Villafañe’s daughters.
In addition, they pointed out that “one of the judges voted to ratify the precautionary measure, albeit modifying it for a less severe one. The other two judges believed that the measure was premature because Morla had not yet been summoned to investigate, that is, that he is not yet formally accused of the crime he would have committed. ”
“That is to say, no judge has said that MORLA has the marks of our father in a legitimate and definitive way, nor that we are not right in our claim. It has only been resolved that ‘for the moment’ the facts that we denounce have to continue being investigated in more depth before being able to dictate a precautionary measure of this type “, they also said.
– .
