Fortunately, the EU is negotiating a budget. One of the main contentious points is the introduction of the rule of law. TVP correspondent in Germany Cezary Gmyz draws attention to an interesting aspect of this matter.
The rule of law in the service of “progress”?
Cezary Gmyz stresses that attempts to link the payment of EU funds to the rule of law may have a second bottom.
What is the rule of law? First, we will fight its connection with funds and then we will announce “marriage for all” including adoption, abortion on request and euthanasia of the elderly are human and citizen rights. And who against breaks the rule of law. Simple?
– he writes Gmyz.
–
He also opposed the general provisions regarding the rule of law Witold Waszczykowski, Member of Law and Justice.
Rightly. The rule of law clause must be precisely defined and apply to absolutely all EU countries. And this is what old and rich EU members are afraid of. They want to control us but they won’t let us control themselves. These are double standards
– comments the former Minister of Foreign Affairs.
–
Legal certainty is part of the rule of law principle. Countries ???????? by lobbying for conditional access to the EU budget and not clearly specifying the content of this principle, are in fact counter to it. The budget dependent on the “rule of law” is illegal, extra-treaty limitation of member rights‼
– writes Rafał Bochenek, sharing the post of the former prime minister Beata Szydło.
–
–
