Covid: Carlos Zannini apologized for being arrogant but defended his vaccination

“If I have seemed superb, I have not been correct in expressing myself and I apologize to Rial and everyone”, said the National Treasury Attorney, Carlos Zannini, after his controversial statements about his irregular vaccination. Days ago, in a television interview, the official said that he did not regret having benefited from a vip vaccination against the coronavirus. His sayings they aroused criticism from the opposition and from sympathizers of the official space itself.

“I have been vaccinated when the vaccine was a poison, on December 22, there was a complaint against the President for poisoning and it was an act of defense of the politics and militancy of the vaccine “, said in dialogue with Vanishing Point, for FM La Patriada. “The same people who said yesterday that it was poison today say that it is a privilege,” he added.

In this sense, Zannini stated: “It must be a legal discussion, not a moral one, each one has their own assessment of the facts, but What I say is that I was in legal conditions and that is where I stand”. And he limited: “I also did it because of what they said about the vaccine at that time.”

“I think there was an institutional blackout that lasted four years and his name was Mauricio Macri. They dictated a rule and did not comply with the limits that were set. In the case of Alberto Fernández it has been very prolific. They have a position that exempts them from being consistent. They discredit politics, while doing politics, “he said, and explained:” It is not a democratic right, it is undemocratic, it is the same that wanted to suppress adversaries or enemies, they only comply with the rules that favor it, Argentina was a center of the lawfare, they criminalized politics as in Brazil and Ecuador. They even outlawed political leaders ”.

He also underlined the role of the Judiciary. “Two of the members of the Court have already advanced that no matter how much they are by law (the restrictions) are not going to endorse them, when Congress dictates a norm it is taken as partisan and they do not want to apply it. Here there was a judicial reform and they declared it unconstitutional, ”he said.

Zannini also referred to the criminal complaint for the indebtedness with the IMF: “This loan entered through one door and left through the other, we are not investigating the economic policy of macrismo or questioning that it is necessary to pay that money, nor are we judging to the Fund (because they have immunity), but rather we seek to know if a group of officials violated the law ”. According to the attorney, “some crimes we already consider as proven, the misuse of money has been proven, even the Fund said. The stage to see who was responsible is early and it is not advisable to condemn previously as Macrismo did, criminalizing politics ”.

THE NATION

–