<div id="firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type="article" data-bind-html-compile="article.body" data-first-article-body="
Writer Muhammad Tawfiq has published a book entitled "Ahmed Zaki 86" Include the stations of the march "Black tiger"The family of the deceased artist believed him to be the bearer of abuse and false information, forcing them to bring a lawsuit against the author.
Details of the crisis
At first, the artist’s sister, Ahmed Zaki, Mona Abdel Ghani, said in statements to the website "Sky News Arabia"His brother is a big star who has presented various works of art, and he shouldn’t be limited to offensive information like that "His mother did not raise him and remarried after his father died".
added: "The author was supposed to return to his family Ahmed Zaki; To help him and provide him with the information he needs so that the book looks good and fits the status of the artist Ahmed Zaki, but he has distorted and distorted the image of his mother, using false information"as described.
Among those "disinformation" What was mentioned in the book, as Mona relates, is the author’s claim that the deceased artist’s mother had filed for divorce, when in fact she didn’t and didn’t ask. divorce Eventually, her husband died. It is also false information that he (Zaki) refused his mother to visit him in the hospital, which is not true.
disease "the emperor"
In this context, Mona revealed that Ahmed Zaki’s mother did not visit him while he was in the hospital during his illness, explaining that he "In March 2005, one of the art magazines published the title on the cover: "Ahmed Zaki yells that he wants to see his mother"How is it possible to repeat that he refused to visit him?"
Regarding her mother’s marriage story, she said: "70 years had passed, a woman had married at the age of 13 and on the death of Ahmed Zaki’s father she had the right to remarry. he was raised with his family members and obtained "DIPLOA technical" From the Zagazig Governorate, this means that he did not live as an expatriate away from his family, or that his mother expelled him and adopted him by other people, as the writer also recalled in his book.".
Black tiger
On the other hand, the author, Mohamed Tawfiq, replied, in statements exclusive to the website "Sky News Arabia" On the controversy, claiming that he did not in any way offend the artist Ahmed Zaki or his family, claiming that the late artist’s family did not read the same book (while his sister says she read it and therefore moved against the writer in court).
He pointed out that the book is about love "Black tiger"He wasn’t talking about his mother; The book is far from her biography and personal life.
He added: "The book is about Ahmed Zaki in 1986, specifically about a film "innocent"Through it, he talks about his artwork, but he didn’t address Ahmed Zaki’s life from birth until his death.".
The author asked: "When you said Ahmed Zaki graduated from Sanayeh School, did that insult him?"And he says he quoted a text in his book: "Ahmed’s sense of alienation continued to dominate him, but the confusion of pity grew in the eyes of those around him."What’s wrong or wrong with that sentence?
Tawfiq has indicated that he has not received any lawsuit so far and that he has not received any financial profit in exchange for the book, and this is the love of the artist Ahmed Zaki, as he said.
Innocent movie
And regarding his failure to return to artist Ahmed Zaki’s family to get the information he wanted, writer Mohamed Tawfiq explained that "In the book he did not mention his biography to return to them, but he spoke of the film The Innocent and the Lamented Family is not aware of any information about the work".
fight for love "the emperor"
The author revealed it "About to file a lawsuit against the sister of the artist Ahmed Zaki"accusing her of "defamation of him"as well as "His insult to artist Ahmed Zaki when he mentioned in one of the programs that Ahmed Zaki’s mother was a virtuous woman who refused to visit her son at home for not meeting the artists, and therefore may have offended her brother and her. art.".
“>
Writer Mohamed Tawfiq published a book called “Ahmed Zaki 86”, which included the stations of the “Black Panther” march. The deceased artist’s family felt that he brought abuse and false information, forcing them to sue the author.
Details of the crisis
Initially, the artist’s sister, Ahmed Zaki, Mona Abdel Ghani, said in statements to “Sky News Arabia” that her brother is a big star who has featured various works of art and shouldn’t be limited to offensive information like that. “his mother did not raise him and married after the death of his father.”.
He added: “The author should have returned to the family Ahmed Zaki; To help him and provide him with the information he needs so that the book looks good and fits the state of the artist Ahmed Zaki, but he has distorted it and distorted the image of his mother, using false information, “he described. .
Among those “misinformation” contained in the book, as Mona says, is the author’s assertion that the mother of the late artist had asked for a divorce, when in reality she did not and did not ask divorce Eventually, her husband died. It is also false information that he (Zaki) refused his mother to visit him in the hospital, which is not true.
Disease of the “emperor”.
In this context, Mona revealed the fact that Ahmed Zaki’s mother did not visit him while he was in the hospital during his illness, explaining that “in March 2005 one of the art magazines published a title on the cover:” Ahmed Zaki yells that he (wants) to see his mother, “Saying that he refused to visit him?”
Regarding her mother’s marriage story, she said: “It’s been 70 years. A woman got married at the age of 13 and, on the death of Ahmed Zaki’s father, she had the right to remarry. It’s completely legal. and not a defect or constitute a mistake .. Zaki at that time was raised with his family and obtained a “Diploma of Crafts” from the Zagazig Governorate, which means that he did not live as an expatriate away from his family, or that his mother expelled him and adopted him from other people, as the writer also mentioned in his book.
Black tiger
In contrast, the author Mohamed Tawfiq, in exclusive statements to Sky News Arabia, responded to the controversy, saying that he had in no way offended the artist Ahmed Zaki or his family, arguing that the late artist’s family did not read the same book (while her sister says she read it), so I took legal action against the writer.
He pointed out that the book is about the love of the “Black Panther” and is not about his mother; The book is far from her biography and personal life.
He added: “The book is about Ahmed Zaki in 1986, specifically the movie” The Innocent “, and through it he talks about his works of art, but it doesn’t talk about Ahmed Zaki’s life from birth until his death.”
The author asked: “You said Ahmed Zaki graduated from Sanayeh School, was this an insult to him?” He says he mentioned a text in his book about him: “Ahmed’s sense of alienation continued to dominate him, and rather the confusion and pity in the eyes of those around him was increasing,” he wondered. What’s wrong or offensive in that sentence.
Tawfiq has indicated that he has not received any lawsuit so far and that he has not received any financial profit in exchange for the book, and this is the love of the artist Ahmed Zaki, as he said.
Innocent movie
And of his failure to return to artist Ahmed Zaki’s family to get the information he wanted, writer Mohamed Tawfik explained that “he did not mention his biography in the book to return to them, but spoke about the film The Innocent and the family of the deceased ignores any information on the work “.
Fight for the love of the “Emperor”
The author revealed that he was “in the process of filing a lawsuit against the sister of the artist Ahmed Zaki”, accusing her of “defaming him”, as well as “offending the artist Ahmed Zaki when he mentioned in one of the programs that The mother of Ahmed Zaki was a virtuous woman who refused to visit her son at home so as not to be interviewed. ” artists, and therefore she may have offended her brother and her art. “
