Home » today » Business » Attorney Schilchegger on the obligation to vaccinate and the Constitutional Court

Attorney Schilchegger on the obligation to vaccinate and the Constitutional Court

In a detailed interview, the Linz lawyer MMag. dr Michael Schilchegger Procedure and length of proceedings before the Constitutional Court. He explains the importance of the famous letter with the questions to Minister of Health Mückstein and gives valuable advice on how responsible citizens can prepare well and intensively for compulsory vaccination, formulate necessary inquiries from the authorities and reduce their own risk.

By Florian Machl

Please click on the video below to play it.

Lawyer Michael Schilchegger describes the problem of the long duration of proceedings before the VFGH. For example, a decision as to whether mandatory vaccination violates the constitution could last into next year.

If a citizen wants to be sure that the vaccination does not harm them physically, they can go to the authorities for a long time – and thus postpone the vaccination obligation for them individually. After all, nobody can deny you individual medical advice and a precise clarification of the risks. You can ask the authorities reasonable and legitimate questions and refer to your own medical history.

You can find out whether you are allergic to active ingredients and should consult various doctors. Because, according to Schilchegger, a dermatologist can only define whether the vaccination is problematic for the skin, for other questions you might need other specialists. If you proceed correctly and explain to the authorities in a reasonable manner why this clarification is necessary, criminal liability for refusal to vaccinate cannot be completely prevented, but it can be postponed into the distant future.

Mandatory vaccination law could also simply expire

The law itself is initially only valid for two years – at the latest then there are national elections. The politician and legal expert doubts whether a government would extend such a controversial law in the election year.

Schilchegger is active with its own Telegram group and advises interested parties on their individual legal options and strategies, taking into account their financial possibilities.

His Telegram channel https://t.me/schilchegger already has over 12,000 registered interested parties and offers a wide range of up-to-date information on constitutional complaints and other possible responses to mandatory vaccination and government measures that may be excessive.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.