“The problem is that the election of those who access the right to social programs is not in the hands of the State and there is discretion,” Larroque said, adding in a critical tone: “Some think that by having more social plans they have more power.”
“There are complaints that a percentage of the plans is taken from the beneficiaries. That is reprehensible.” warned.
Faced with this situation, he proposed as a solution the incursion of the Universal Basic Salary in the economy, something that was also requested by the former president in an act of the CTA in Avellaneda.
“I do not agree with the name ‘Universal Basic Salary’ because it is not for the entire social universe, but only for a part of it. The most correct thing would be to talk about a transitory income policy”, said who is identified with the group La Cámpora.
From his point of view, this assistance “would imply a greater investment but it is not something disproportionate” and he advanced that what the ruling party proposes is that this income be “between $10,000 and $13,000 per person.”
“With the social plans, sectors with bellicose views regarding the social situation are empowered,” he added.
In the same vein, he did not escape the controversy with the Avoid Movement started by Fernández de Kirchner and targeted its leader, Aemilius Persian: “He was the one who contributed the most to putting tension between Alberto and Cristina. I’m sorry, but that’s how it is.”
“The Evita Movement had a promiscuous link with Macri and co-governed with Carolina Stanley,” he warned.
He also added Fernando Chino Navarro, secretary of Parliamentary Relations, to the situation, who this week responded to the president of the Chamber of Senators and assured that “he has not been to a neighborhood for a long time.”
“It seems that Persico wants to go back 20 years. It amuses me that he and Chino Navarro say that Cristina is liberal, ”El Cuervo sentenced and added one more: “Chinese Navarro and Persian play hide and seek. They wanted to put tension between Cristina and Scioli, and they played with Randazzo”.
More incisive, the official spoke about the direction of the economy and pointed out to Martín Guzmán, Minister of Finance: “He has a dissociated view of reality. He responds more to outsiders than to insiders.”
“Guzmán’s policies explain, in economic terms, they explain the electoral defeat,” he affirmed and described the portfolio holder as someone who “can’t handle anything,” in statements to the Toma y Daca program that is broadcast on AM750.
–
