(…)
GEIR HANSEN: Because I think that I haven’t spoken out in over ten years now, because of this. But I now think that the time has really come, eh now this decision will come in a couple of weeks.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: It will come in ten days, I think.
GEIR HANSEN: Yes, ten more days, and then the time has really come to be able to say something. I have sent a letter to NN (NRK journalist) in which I explain a little about, can you say, the circumstances surrounding the first questioning. Because that’s what will be, first of all, will mean that I break all the rules of the Attorney General and, and that I use this victim, in such a way that it becomes easier for you to minimize your deeds, also a lot of things like that. Eh, but I’ll explain a bit about why it turned out the way it did. So he got that, and then I realized that he should create a set-up where he asks questions and then he uses part of what I have delivered to him, and puts it into some sort of setting then, a written setting. And then he probably does the same with you, to various questions that he has asked you, and then you answer. So that it becomes, you could say, an answer with me and you more or less in the same, in the same matter in a way.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: Yes, so, yes. Because I, I really agree with that. Because by explaining it properly, we sort of show that the way you describe it is also a bit wrong.
GEIR HANSEN: Yes, so the reason, so the reason why that.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: And that it comes out a bit properly.
GEIR HANSEN: Yes.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: As it has not been done before.
GEIR HANSEN: Yes. Now I saw that they have not mentioned this with the defender, they have and talked about earlier that I should wait for the defender. But it was all right for you that we talked about the case anyway, even if the defense attorney was on his way. Saw it [utydelig] I don’t really have any problems with it, but they use everything for what it’s worth.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: Yes.
GEIR HANSEN: Eh, also, the reason why when you didn’t confess there, I thought that he must know that he will, in a way, be made responsible for himself.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: Mm.
GEIR HANSEN: I thought what’s holding me back, he holds back. And then I know that when others are implicated, it is perhaps more difficult to come up with an admission.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: [utydelig]
GEIR HANSEN: Not true. And then I also knew what all the witnesses had said. Not all the witnesses, but many witnesses in the Egs area, who had explained about you and Viggo’s relationship. It was almost just the two of you who went together, uh, more or less every day. And it was a very bossy relationship that Viggo had, he who decided most of the things, he who took the lead, led most of the things, and was sort of that nasty type. While you are described as the modest, slightly submissive type, and so on and so on. And, and, we knew that there must have been two up there at the crime scene.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: Yes.
GEIR HANSEN: That they had to be two. So, we had no doubt about that, and and. And with that background then, that relationship between you, I actually don’t think it was strange to ask if you could have been a kind of victim, in the sense that it could have been Viggo who led the way.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: [utydelig]
GEIR HANSEN: So that’s why, so that’s why I stand fully and completely that I, that I did it that way.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: Yes, no, because I remember it being said that when you said that, I got something to think about.
GEIR HANSEN: Yes, but I could see that in you. For that and that, exactly the self-report I wrote the next day. Maybe I should have written something more in it. That it not only gave you something to think about, but also that I hit a sore spot. Because you were almost in tears. [utydelig] I won’t forget that. The something that I saw that it hit so to speak.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: [utydelig]
GEIR HANSEN: When I asked about this. And soon after, you recognized what had happened.
JAN HELGE ANDERSEN: Yes.
–
