Home » today » News » [사회]Jeong Gyeong-shim sentenced as scheduled for the first trial today…How is the court’s judgment of’family corruption and private equity’?

[사회]Jeong Gyeong-shim sentenced as scheduled for the first trial today…How is the court’s judgment of’family corruption and private equity’?

[앵커]

The first trial sentence of Dongyang University professor Kyung-Shim Chung, who was charged with the child’s entrance examination and allegations of private equity funds, is issued today (23rd).

Since the prosecution started the investigation, there has been a great controversy, and public opinion has been sharply divided. In this case, attention is being paid to how the court’s first judgment will be made.

Reporter Na Hye-in reports.

[기자]

People are standing at intervals at the Court Complex in Seocho-dong, Seoul.

One day before the trial for the first trial by Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, a public lottery was held.

[이종협 / 방청권 응모자 : 뉴스만 봤을 때하고 현장의 느낌, 참석한 사람들의 분위기, 판사나 피고인의 표정, 이런 건 현장에서만 볼 수 있잖아요.]

Considering that the adjournment recommendation due to the spread of Corona 19 is a case of great social interest, the judiciary decided to proceed with Professor Jeong’s first trial sentence as scheduled.

Professor Jeong was handed over to trial for fifteen charges, including violations of the Capital Markets Act, forgery of private documents, and a teacher concealing evidence.

Suspicion of irregularities in the entrance examination of children, such as forgery of citations that were held until court demonstrations, and suspicions of private equity funds, including borrowed name investments or false consulting contracts,

Such as suspicion that the related evidence was removed by having a brokerage employee.

Earlier, the prosecution identified this case as an offense of the privileged class and a new political conflict, and asked the court to sentence Professor Jeong to a medium sentence of 7 years in prison and a fine of 900 million won.

On the other hand, Professor Jeong’s side reflects on the fact that the family enjoyed benefits without criticism, but has always claimed innocence, saying that it was only a case inflated by the prosecution’s target and overinvestigation.

In the meantime, there has always been a coexistence of the view that the prosecution attempted to defeat the power-type corruption investigation with the logic of the political camp over the case of Professor Jeong, and the extreme evaluation of the’Indian rain system’ type investigation that the prosecution forcefully dug in to protect the vested rights.

Socially, it is an incident that actually divided the entire people into two and caused a great conflict, so whatever conclusions can be reached, the impact will be difficult.

This is Hyein Na, YTN.

※’Your report becomes news’ YTN awaits your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]

– .

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.