Ryu Hyuk, an inspector at the Ministry of Justice (former director of the Changwon District Prosecutor’s Office). [뉴스1]
– On the 8th, prosecutor Ryu-hyuk at the Ministry of Justice’s Supervisory Commission officially apologized for the surprise change by the Ministry of Justice last year’s obligation to hold the supervisory commission to’optional’ without the consent of the members. It also announced that it will come up with a plan to improve the overall inspection regulations that have been controversial over the’procedure destruction’.
‘Goseong Controversy’ Inspector Park Eun-jung absent after taking a vacation
– Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol, led by Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, was blocked in the court and President Moon Jae-in apologized.
“Candidate Beom-gye Park also agrees on the need to improve inspection procedures”
– In summary, the JoongAng Ilbo coverage, the first regular inspection committee of the new year held at the Ministry of Justice’s Gwacheon Office on that day, pointed out that inspector A said, “Let’s go over the revision of the order of the Ministry of Justice.” “It is totally inconsistent with the original purpose of the system to’pass’ the prosecutors’ commission while punishing the prosecutor general who is the first in the history of the constitution.”
OK Inspector Ryu said, “I apologize for the confusion.” He said, “We are preparing a plan to improve the overall inspection procedure.” “The candidate (Park Bum-gye) said that there is a need for revision.”It is known that it is a classic.
–
News 1
–
The’passing controversy’ arose when the Ministry of Justice launched an inspection investigation on Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol at the end of October last year and revised the regulations by surprise. Article 4 before the amendment was made on the inspection of important matters in accordance with the regulations of the Inspection Committee of the Ministry of Justice. Consultation from the Ministry of Justice’s Inspection Committee‘It says. However, on November 3 of last year, the Ministry of Justice announced that the law on the inspection of important matters in accordance with the regulations of theYou can get advice from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.Changed to’. Change of mandatory provisions to voluntary provisions without the consent of the inspectorto be.
Then, inspector B, etc. said, “The inspection committee was introduced in May 2005 during the Roh Moo-hyun administration for fair and transparent inspection work.ego, Minister Chu also mentioned strengthening surveillance after inaugurationHe said, “Amendment of the Ministry of Justice’s directive is a measure against this,” he said.
On this day, the prosecutor’s office was on the agenda to inspect about 10 people, including one prosecutor and correctional workers. There was also an opinion that “the disciplinary prosecution committee will be held first, but it makes no sense that the disciplinary prosecutor general will be held with the prosecutor’s office passed.”
Park Eun-jung’s “passing controversy” also “coordinates and improves opinions”
–
–
Inspector Park Eun-jung is leaving the Ministry of Justice for lunch. Reporter Kim Kyung-rok
–
“In particular, it is said that a problem was raised regarding the inspection proceedings due to the’decision of the inspector in charge’. About this Inspector Ryu said, “We started working on improving the overall inspection procedure, including how to coordinate opinions between the top and the bottom,” and “I will report any improvement proposals.”Said.
This is interpreted as a remark in consideration of the situation in which Goseong came and went between prosecutors, such as Park Eun-jeong, who led the prosecution at the Prosecutor General’s Office on the 1st of last month, and his immediate supervisor, Prosecutor Ryu, and Daejeon District Prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa.
At the time, prosecutors who did not agree to the supervision of President Yun were excluded from the work, and disagreements were removed from the report. Accordingly, it was evaluated that it was the site where the’naked face’ of an unreasonable disciplinary claim was exposed. finally The Supervisory Commission unanimously said, “The request for disciplinary action against President Yun, the exclusion of duties, and the request for an investigation are unsuitable due to a serious procedural defect.I concluded.
However, the controversial prosecutor Park Eun-jung, the prosecutor’s office, was absent from the prosecution committee because he was on vacation due to health problems. Instead, only eight inspectors, inspectors Ryu, and prosecutors Hyeong-soo Jang and Jin-seong Park attended the meeting.
Reporters Kim Soo-min and Jung Yu-jin [email protected]
–
