“The Ministry of Justice has undergone a change in the investigation system due to the prosecution reform, but it is important to make efforts to settle the public so that they are not uncomfortable with the change.” (President Moon Jae-in, conferment ceremony of appointment of new Minister of Justice on January 29)
President Moon Jae-in gave a letter of appointment to Justice Minister Park Beom-gye, and a great confusion is taking place in the passport over the “settlement of the prosecution reform” by one party. There is a theory of speed control that accepts this expression as “directing the speed control of the so-called’Prosecution Reform Season 2′, such as the establishment of a serious crime investigation office (heavy water office) that completely takes the power of investigation from the prosecution” As they confront, self-determination is taking place.
President Moon Jae-in is giving a letter of appointment to the new Justice Minister Park Beom-gye at the Blue House on the afternoon of the 29th of last month.
–
On the morning of the 24th, Democratic Party chief spokesman Choi In-ho said, “It is not at all known that there is a disagreement among the prosecution reform-related parties,” but as controversy spread more this afternoon, the clarification of Choi’s chief spokesman became unclear.
Speed Control Theory vs. Hardline Theory
–
–
Park Ju-min and Democratic Party member.
–
The gun was launched on the 23rd by Rep. Park Joo-min, a secretary of the Democratic Party’s Prosecutors’ Reform Special Committee. Rep. Park said in a radio interview that day, “I have never heard of (speed control theory) officially or informally.” On the 24th, he also appeared in a radio interview, saying, “The’settlement of the system’ that Minister Park heard from President Moon is not the speed control of season 2 of the prosecution reform.”
Democratic Party lawmaker Hwang Un-ha, who is in charge of the’Just like a meeting of members of the action,’ and also added. Rep. Hwang said in a radio interview on the 24th, “I know that President Moon’s words are not about speed control,” and “it seems like an interpretation that reflects the wishes of the prosecution or conservative media.”
As the controversy grew, Minister Park began to evolve. Minister Park said at a visit to the Daejeon Probation Office on the 24th, “I did not express the president’s request in terms of speed control, but some seem to be dealing with such expressions,” and “the president did not use that expression.” He said, “Before being a minister, I am a member of the ruling party. Of course, if the parties gather, they will follow.”
However, speed control officials say, “It doesn’t matter if there was an expression.” In a phone call with the JoongAng Ilbo on the 24th, a key passport official said, “Minister Park listened to President Moon and expressed it in the National Assembly by paraphrasing, but that is not a’mistranslation’.” Rep. Lee Sang-min of the fifth line argued that “President Moon’s words are to settle the new system and focus on it so that it can operate well.”
–
President Yoo Young-min (right), president of the Blue House, attends a general meeting of the Steering Committee held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the 24th, answering questions of lawmakers. On the left is Kim Sang-jo, policy director. Reporter Oh Jong-taek
–
When President Moon’s remarks were interpreted in favor of each other, the Blue House joined forces, but the controversy grew even more. President Yoo Young-min, who attended the plenary meeting of the National Assembly Steering Committee on the 24th, said, “The day President Moon came to receive the letter of appointment, President Moon made a request for speed control.” “The fact is, the story came out when the President asked for a cup of tea on the day of giving the letter of appointment.” Said.
Immediately following, Democratic Party leader Kim Tae-yeon, the chairman of the National Assembly, refuted, “You didn’t mean that President Moon said’adjust the speed’,” but said, “I don’t remember the exact wording, but that was the meaning.” When Chairman Kim pointed out that “if you answer that way, then President Moon used speed control wording,” Mr. Yoo did not bend his position, saying, “You expressed that meaning.”
Democrats from outside the National Assembly continued to participate in the war. Former Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae wrote on his Facebook page on the 24th, “If we have to adjust the speed now (after the enactment of the criminal procedure law), we will not have enough time to spend 67 years.” Gyeongnam Governor Kim Gyeong-soo said in a radio interview, “Even if there is a position on the speed control theory of the Blue House, the reform of the prosecution is decided through the law,” he said. “If the President said that, it does not mean that even the party should be organized.”
Kang Kyung-pa “March Initiative” vs. Leadership “burden”
–
Rep. Park Ju-min said on the 23rd, “The prosecution reform season 2 is a matter led by the party. As the content agreement is almost reached, only the final stage of coordination and presentation remains.” On the 24th, he said, “It is proceeding according to the schedule to initiate in March.” It means that even with the Blue House’s order to adjust the speed, the hardline members of the Prosecution Reform Special Committee will go on the path.
Rep. Park also said, “The special committee was created at the party level to give the status of the party argument within the proposal of the special committee for reform of the prosecution.” A key party official also admitted, “It is true that the bill promulgated by the special committee made through the resolution of the Party Supreme Committee has the weight equivalent to that of the party.”
However, the party leadership is struggling with the burden of promoting rapid prosecution reform. A key official in the hospital said, “Until this term of office of the in-house leadership (May 6), there is little possibility that the agenda will be put into the party by posting an agenda to the assembly of the lawmakers.” Another top commissioner complained, “It is not the time to focus on the separation of investigation and prosecution, but there is a side where the special commission is taking the wrong direction.”
與, initiated the revision of the National Intelligence Service Act
–
–
Nak-yeon Lee, CEO of the Democratic Party. Reporter Oh Jong-taek
–
The Democratic Party raised an offensive against the Lee Myung-bak government’s National Intelligence Service’s illegal inspection controversy and former Cheong Wa Dae chief political officer Park Hyeong-jun. Democratic Party President Lee Nak-yeon said, “There are more than 20,000 illegal inspections under the NIS from the Lee Myung-bak administration until President Park Geun-hye,” and “We will investigate the truth about who was reported.” Chief spokesman Choi said, “I urge you to disclose whether you have received any reports of illegal inspections while Park was in office.” At the Democratic Party’s general meeting on that afternoon, discussions on the revision of the National Intelligence Service Act were also held. A member of the metropolitan area jungjin who attended the general assembly of the lawmakers said, “We will continue to discuss the revision of the NIS law to create a legal basis for processing illegal temple information held by the NIS at the general assembly of the lawmakers next week.”
Reporter Song Seung-hwan and Nam Soo-hyun [email protected] 
–
:quality(80)/cdn-kiosk-api.telegraaf.nl/a9148f34-769d-11eb-91d3-02d2fb1aa1d7.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
