Home » today » Business » After vaccination death: insurance does not pay – because of participation in experiment!

After vaccination death: insurance does not pay – because of participation in experiment!

A controversial case is currently being hotly debated on social media: in France, a rich, elderly businessman from Paris is said to have died as a result of a corona injection. Previously, he had taken out life insurance policies worth millions for the benefit of his children and grandchildren, according to a media report. Although vaccination is recognized as the cause of death by doctors and insurance, the insurance company does not pay the premium. The reasoning is awesome: The side effects of the corona bites are known and published. The deceased therefore took part in an experiment at his own risk!

Insurance: Experimental vaccination resulting in death is like suicide

The insurance company justified the refusal to pay out to the family with the fact that the Taking experimental drugs or treatments, including corona injections, are expressly excluded from the insurance contract. The family’s subsequent lawsuit against the insurance company was unsuccessful.

Side effects published – therefore own risk

The court is said to have justified its judgment as follows: “The Side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not pretend not to have known about it when he voluntarily took the vaccination. There is no law or mandate in France forcing him to be vaccinated. Hence his death essentially suicided“. Since suicide is not covered by the policy from the outset, the insurance wiped clean with it.

Scandal Verdict: Taking a Deadly Risk Legally Suicide

“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who Participation in the phase three experiment, which has not been proven to be harmless, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally considered a voluntary risk of death not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense will be considered justified and contractually justified recognized as this publicly known risk-taking is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily assume the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”

Mainstream is silent

In France Mainstream media has not yet been reported on this scandal case. The case is to be published by the family lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, on social media have been. Unfortunately, no sources or court documents are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot be verified at the moment. However, the editors were Letter from an Austrian insurance company leaked, which relates to this specific case.

+++ Important: If you have worries and depression that make you desperate, get help: https://www.gesundheit.gv.at/leben/suizidpraevention/inhalt +++

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.