BYU Football at a Crossroads: Kalani Sitake’s Future Hinges on Institutional Investment
Kalani Sitake, BYU’s head football coach, is facing a pivotal decision regarding his future, potentially leaving his “dream job” for the possibility at Penn State. The situation highlights a growing disparity in resource allocation within BYU Athletics, specifically between football and basketball, and raises questions about the university’s commitment to sustaining a high-level football program.
BYU recently witnessed its basketball team achieve significant success, culminating in a 14-6 Big 12 record. This success has prompted a re-evaluation of coaching compensation, with the basketball coach earning over $4 million annually. The article argues that, given football’s role as the primary revenue generator and national visibility driver for BYU Athletics, the football coach should be compensated above the basketball coach and aligned with the average for Power Four conference programs to ensure retention and continued success.
Several factors could motivate sitake to consider leaving BYU. These include a desire for new challenges after achieving considerable success with the current team, the potential for “generational money” to secure his family’s future, or a feeling of being undervalued or lacking the autonomy to fully implement his vision for the program. The author emphasizes Sitake’s relationship-oriented nature, suggesting that a lack of institutional support – mirroring the resources and autonomy recently afforded to the basketball program – is a key concern.
Should Sitake depart, BYU would face a significant coaching search. Potential candidates mentioned include current BYU staff members jay Hill (assistant head coach/defensive coordinator), Kelly Poppinga (special teams coordinator), and Jason Beck (offensive coordinator). Former BYU coach Bronco mendenhall, currently at Utah State, and NFL coach Kellen Moore (New Orleans Saints) were also named as possibilities, along with Ken Niumatololo.The impact of Sitake potentially bringing staff and players with him to Penn State further complicates the scenario.
The article presents two contrasting narratives. the first,optimistic scenario suggests Sitake has reached an agreement with BYU leadership that would secure his long-term future as the “ambassador and leader” of BYU football,providing the resources necessary to compete at a Top 25 level. However, this agreement still requires approval from upper campus administration and the board of trustees.
The second, more pessimistic scenario indicates Penn State is poised to offer Sitake a package – including ample financial compensation and NIL opportunities for players – that BYU is unable to match. Penn State reportedly believes they have secured Sitake’s commitment,and the author suggests it is likely only a matter of time before he accepts their offer.
Ultimately, the situation underscores BYU’s critical need to demonstrate a commitment to investing in its football program at a level commensurate with its importance to the university’s athletic and national profile.
