Erosion of US Soft Power in Asia Fuels Regional Realignment
Washington’s evolving approach to international relations is raising alarms across Asia, as a reliance on pressure tactics risks undermining decades of established influence and potentially pushing regional powers closer to China.A shift away from the persuasive power of example and toward transactional demands is fueling a sense of unease among long-standing allies.
The Decline of ‘Imperialism by Invitation’
For years, the United States projected leadership through a combination of security guarantees, open markets, and the creation of international institutions. This approach, sometimes described as “imperialism by invitation,” fostered a sense of legitimacy and attracted partners. Political scientist Joseph Nye argues that this is the essence of soft power
- the ability to achieve desired outcomes through attraction rather than coercion.
However, current US policy increasingly relies on pressuring allies, publicly criticizing them for perceived shortcomings, and using security assurances as bargaining chips. This shift is perceived as a departure from the collaborative spirit that once defined US leadership.
Historical Parallels: Lessons from 1941
The current situation echoes historical precedents, notably the lead-up to World War II. while economic sanctions played a direct role in the attack on Pearl Harbor, deeper issues of racial prejudice and exclusion fueled Japanese resentment toward the United States.
At the 1919 Versailles Peace Conference, Japan, despite being an invited participant, was largely ignored by Western powers. French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau reportedly dismissed the Japanese delegation with a disparaging remark about their appearance . this perceived disrespect culminated in the rejection of Japan’s proposal for a racial equality clause and its exclusion from the Council of Four.
This treatment solidified into discriminatory policies, such as the 1924 US Immigration Act, which barred Asian immigrants from citizenship, and the unequal naval limitations imposed by the Washington Naval Treaty. Edward House, a close advisor to President Woodrow Wilson, privately warned that failing to acknowledge Japan’s rising influence would inevitably lead to conflict .
Did You Know? The concept of soft power, as articulated by Joseph Nye, emphasizes the importance of cultural and ideological influence in international relations, contrasting with the traditional reliance on military and economic coercion.
Contemporary Concerns: Echoes of the past
Today, similar patterns are emerging. The “China Initiative,” launched during the Trump administration,led to increased scrutiny and,in some cases,unwarranted investigations of Chinese scholars and researchers,often based solely on their ethnicity .
More recently,citizens of allied nations have also experienced heightened scrutiny. In July 2025, a Korean-born PhD student, a long-term US permanent resident, was detained for over a week at San Francisco International Airport without explanation . japanese tourists and visitors to Hawaii have also reported being denied entry based on vague suspicions .
Regional Response and Hedging Strategies
These actions are fostering a perception that the US no longer values its Asian partners as equals. This sentiment is being actively exploited by Beijing, which portrays the US as hypocritical and unwilling to accept a multi-polar world. Wang Yi, head of the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign affairs commission, has argued that Asians will never be fully accepted by the West, irrespective of superficial changes in appearance .
In response, South Korea and Japan are beginning to explore option security arrangements. On August 16, a leading Korean newspaper reported on discussions regarding a security Plan B
in anticipation of potential US disengagement in northeast Asia . Both countries are quietly re-establishing diplomatic channels with China as a strategic hedge.
| year | Event | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 1919 | Versailles Peace Conference | Japan’s proposal for racial equality rejected, fueling resentment. |
| 1924 | US Immigration Act | Banned Asian immigration, institutionalizing discriminatory practices. |
| 1941 | Attack on Pearl Harbor | Culmination of escalating tensions and perceived US hostility. |
| 2018-2021 | China Initiative | Increased scrutiny of Chinese scholars, raising concerns about racial profiling. |
| 2025 | Increased border scrutiny of Asian travelers | Renewed concerns about discriminatory practices and US commitment to partnership. |
The Path Forward: Restoring Trust and Respect
The United States can regain its leadership position in Asia by prioritizing respect, empathy, and genuine partnership. As scholar Alastair Johnston warns, status quo powers must avoid offending the prestige and national honor of rising powers.
This requires treating Asian nations not as subordinates, but as co-architects of the regional order. Only through a demonstrable commitment to fairness and inclusivity can Washington rebuild trust and secure its long-term interests in the region.
Pro Tip: Understanding the historical context of US-asia relations is crucial for interpreting current events and anticipating future trends.
what steps can the US take to rebuild trust with its Asian allies? How might China capitalize on the current erosion of US soft power?
Long-Term Trends and Context
The shifting dynamics in US-Asia relations are part of a broader global trend toward multipolarity. The rise of China as a major economic and military power is challenging the long-standing US-led order. This transition requires a recalibration of US foreign policy, moving away from a unilateral approach toward greater collaboration and multilateralism. The success of this recalibration will depend on the US’s ability to address historical grievances, demonstrate genuine respect for its partners, and adapt to a changing world order.
Frequently asked Questions
- What is “soft power” and why is it crucial? Soft power is the ability to influence others through attraction and persuasion, rather than coercion. It’s crucial for building lasting alliances and fostering international cooperation.
- How does the current US approach differ from its past strategies in Asia? Historically, the US emphasized cooperation and mutual benefit. The current approach is perceived as more transactional and reliant on pressure tactics.
- What role does historical context play in understanding current tensions? Past grievances,such as the discriminatory treatment of Japan in the early 20th century,continue to shape perceptions and influence regional dynamics.
- What is the “China Initiative” and why was it controversial? The china Initiative was a US Department of Justice program aimed at countering Chinese economic espionage, but it was criticized for racial profiling and overreach.
- What are the potential consequences of a loss of US influence in Asia? A decline in US influence could lead to a more fragmented regional order, increased competition between major powers, and a potential shift in the balance of power.
