NEW YORK — May 10, 2024 —
A federal judge has rejected claims of racial bias in the Diddy sex trafficking case, a ruling that has significant implications for the trial. The decision, made in Manhattan, dismissed arguments that prosecutors targeted Sean “Diddy” Combs due to his race. The judge’s ruling was based on a lack of evidence, and this casts a shadow over the defense’s claims. The outcome could considerably influence the proceedings.
Judge Rejects Claims of Racial Bias in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ Sex trafficking Case
New York, NY – A federal judge has ruled that Sean “Diddy” Combs was not targeted due to his race when prosecutors brought racketeering and sex trafficking charges against him. The decision came just days before opening statements were scheduled to begin in the high-profile trial.
Key Ruling: No Evidence of Racial Bias
Judge Arun Subramanian,presiding over the case in Manhattan federal court,dismissed a request from Combs’ legal team to drop some of the charges. The judge stated that Combs’ lawyers had failed to provide any evidence of discriminatory effect or intent based on race during arguments presented in February.
In a written opinion, Judge Subramanian also denied a motion to suppress evidence in the case.
Defense Argument: Unprecedented Prosecution
combs’ lawyers argued that the prosecution was unprecedented, asserting that most disturbingly, no white person has ever been the target of a remotely similar prosecution.
Prosecution’s Rebuttal: Severity of alleged Crimes
Prosecutors successfully argued that the extent of criminal conduct allegedly committed by Combs between 2004 and 2024 justified the charges. They claim combs oversaw a racketeering enterprise that enabled him to sexually abuse women.
Judge Subramanian sided with the prosecution, stating, It’s the severity of what Combs allegedly did — not his race — that mattered.
Defense Claims of humiliation and Bias
Combs’ legal team also alleged that the government sought to humiliate him through news releases, the execution of search warrants at his home, the refusal to allow him to surrender, and alleged leaks to the media.
Though, Judge Subramanian found no evidence to support these claims, writing, Combs doesn’t point to any evidence that racial bias played a role in the Government’s actions, that the prosecution team was responsible for any leaks to the press, or that the way combs’s homes were searched bespeaks a discriminatory purpose.
The judge added that the government’s actions, including press releases and the refusal to allow Combs to self-surrender, were consistent with how similar cases involving defendants of other races have been handled.
Trial Developments: Jury Selection and Charges
- Opening statements were initially scheduled for Monday, following the final stage of jury selection.However, jury selection has faced delays [3].
- Prosecutors allege that Combs, 55, used his fame and power to sexually abuse women from 2004 to 2024.
- Combs has pleaded not guilty and is currently held without bail at a Brooklyn federal lockup.
- The trial is projected to last two months.
Jury Concerns and Selection Process
During jury selection, potential jurors were questioned about their ability to remain fair and impartial. They were also asked if they could decide the case based on facts, even after viewing explicit videos of sexual activity that some might find disturbing.
One potential juror was dismissed after expressing concerns about her “well-being.”
Judge Subramanian canceled plans to finalize the jury on friday, expressing concern that some jurors might reconsider their participation over the weekend.
Potential Penalties and Allegations
If convicted on all charges, which include racketeering, kidnapping, arson, bribery, and sex trafficking, Combs faces a mandatory minimum of 15 years in prison and could potentially be sentenced to life behind bars.
The indictment includes disturbing descriptions of “Freak offs,” alleging drugged-up orgies where women were forced to have sex with male sex workers while Combs filmed them.
The charges also portray Combs as physically abusive, alleging instances of choking, hitting, kicking, and dragging victims, sometimes by the hair. In one instance, he allegedly dangled someone from a balcony.
Defense Response and Evidence
Combs’ lawyers argue that prosecutors are attempting to criminalize consensual sexual activity. They acknowledge that Combs has struggled with substance abuse but claim he has since undergone treatment.
A key piece of evidence against Combs is a recording of him beating a former girlfriend in a Los Angeles hotel hallway in 2016.
After the video aired on CNN, Combs issued an apology, stating, I take full duty for my actions in that video.I was disgusted then when I did it. I’m disgusted now.
Numerous prospective jurors admitted to seeing the video, and some were deemed too affected by it to remain impartial.
FAQ: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Trial
- What are the charges against Sean Combs?
- Racketeering, kidnapping, arson, bribery, and sex trafficking.
- What is the potential sentence if convicted?
- A minimum of 15 years in prison,potentially a life sentence.
- What is the key evidence against combs?
- A video recording of Combs assaulting a former girlfriend in 2016.
- Has jury selection been completed?
- No, jury selection is still in progress [3].