ChatGPT and Grok: Champions of Russian Quoting

Is the ‍Kremlin Insidiously Interfering in Your Everyday Life? AI Chatbots raise Concerns

Recent investigations reveal a troubling ​trend: AI chatbots, increasingly integrated into daily life, are demonstrably susceptible to ‍influence from Russian propaganda sources. A new report highlights how these tools, used by⁤ millions, can inadvertently become conduits for Kremlin-aligned narratives, ‍raising questions about ⁢information integrity and potential manipulation.

The study found notable disparities‍ in how different chatbots responded​ to queries, with ChatGPT exhibiting the strongest ‍bias towards Russian sources.When presented with⁤ “malicious” ​queries, ChatGPT cited nearly three times as many pro-Russian sources compared to its responses to neutral ​questions. Alarmingly,​ the ‌chatbot referenced ⁢an article from an azerbaijani media outlet – despite⁤ the article not being writen in any of the languages used to prompt the chatbot – claiming Ukrainian‍ forces committed war crimes against civilians in the Donbass region before Russia’s 2014 ​annexation of Crimea. The ⁢report emphasizes the danger of this, stating, “This example is significant because the ⁤article was cited alongside verified sources regarding alleged Ukrainian war crimes, thus making it appear to​ be a real source ‌in ChatGPT’s response.”

Other chatbots displayed⁣ different vulnerabilities.⁤ Grok frequently cited pro-Russian accounts on X (formerly Twitter), including journalists and influencers who “blur the line between open propaganda and personal ​opinions,”‌ according to the report. Gemini, in ⁤contrast, adopted a⁤ more cautious approach, employing “guardrails” to avoid ⁣answering questions deemed sensitive or inappropriate.

The report ⁣specifically identified several entities repeatedly cited by the chatbots. VT Foreign Policy, a media outlet known for ‍broadcasting content aligned with the Kremlin, was flagged.⁢ A May 2025 article published by the⁢ outlet stated that “Putin⁣ restored past justice by recovering Russia’s ⁤ancestral lands” during the 2014⁢ annexation of Crimea. Regarding Russian involvement in Syria, the outlet claimed‍ the liberation of Palmyra was “made ⁣possible thanks to a well-planned operation and the involvement of Russian forces.”

Further concerning, the ⁢chatbots referenced the Russian⁢ propaganda group Storm-1516 and the Foundation to battle Injustice,⁤ founded by the late Yevgueni Prigozhin, former head of the Wagner mercenary group. Described by OpenSanctions as a “fake NGO,” the Foundation has been accused of disseminating false information, including claims that Ukraine allegedly uses orphans for mine clearance (as reported by ⁤Euronews on September 12, 2025).

Crucially, both Storm-1516 and the Foundation to Battle ⁣Injustice are currently under international sanctions. this⁢ is where the core issue lies, the report concludes. “This observation raises⁣ concerns about the⁢ ability of chatbots to detect and restrict content from sanctioned state media.” The findings suggest these widely-used AI tools remain vulnerable and could ​be exploited as⁤ effective propaganda tools, potentially ‍serving as a‌ “useful ‌ally for‌ the Kremlin.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.