Home » News » Trump’s Tariff Alternatives: What’s Next After Supreme Court Ruling

Trump’s Tariff Alternatives: What’s Next After Supreme Court Ruling

by Emma Walker – News Editor

WASHINGTON (October 26, 2023) – Should‍ the ‌Supreme Court invalidate his‍ administration’s ⁣use of emergency powers to⁢ impose broad tariffs, former President ⁢Donald Trump retains‌ access to ⁣a⁣ range of ‌other legal authorities to levy‌ taxes on imports, possibly impacting global trade. These options, rooted in decades-old legislation, include provisions allowing tariffs based on national⁣ security concerns⁤ and those designed to counter unfair trade practices.

The 1962 Trade Expansion​ Act’s Section 232 allows ‍the president to impose tariffs​ on⁢ imports deemed a⁣ threat to national ‌security.⁤ Trump utilized this authority⁤ extensively during ​his first term, initiating tariffs on ‌foreign steel and aluminum⁢ in 2018, later​ expanding them to include​ autos, auto ​parts, copper, ‌and lumber. ‌More recently, in September, Section 232‍ tariffs were ⁣extended​ to ⁢kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and upholstered furniture. Legal ‍experts note the difficulty in challenging a president’s national security determination in ‍court, as stated ‍by trade lawyer Veroneau, “it’s difficult to ⁤get courts to second-guess a determination by ​a president on a national security matter.” Section 232 tariffs require investigation by the U.S. Commerce Department, ‌conducted by the administration itself, granting significant control over outcomes.

Another potential avenue is ​Section 338 of the 1930 Tariff Act, ⁢originally part of the⁤ widely criticized Smoot-Hawley tariffs. This ⁢section authorizes the president to impose tariffs⁢ of up to 50% ‍on imports from countries ⁤found to discriminate against ‍U.S. businesses.Unlike Section 232,⁢ Section 338 requires no‍ investigation and has no time ​limit on tariff duration. While never implemented, the U.S. previously used the threat of Section⁢ 338 tariffs ​during trade negotiations in the 1930s. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent ⁣indicated in September that the administration was considering Section 338 as a contingency plan should the Supreme Court rule ⁢against the use of ⁤emergency powers tariffs.

Despite its historical association with the economic downturn ⁤of the Great Depression, Veroneau suggested Trump might⁣ be drawn to Section 338, stating, “To be the first president to ever use it could have some cache.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.