Home » World » Trump Envoy Suggests Ukraine Partition: A Berlin-Style Division?

Trump Envoy Suggests Ukraine Partition: A Berlin-Style Division?

Amidst teh ongoing war, a new plan to address the crisis in the region has emerged, proposing a division of the country.This article delves into the details of the proposed partition plan for Ukraine, analyzing its potential impact and exploring the key players involved. Discover the implications of this controversial strategy and its potential path toward resolving the conflict in Ukraine.

Trump envoy Floats Ukraine Partition Plan Amidst Ongoing Conflict

A proposal to divide Ukraine into zones controlled by major world powers has emerged as a potential solution to the protracted war with Russia.

Trump Envoy Suggests Ukraine Partition: A Berlin-Style Division?
Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with U.S. President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff in Saint Petersburg, Russia April 11, 2025. (credit: SPUTNIK/GAVRIIL GRIGOROV/POOL VIA REUTERS)

Published April 12, 2025

The Kellogg Plan: A Divided Ukraine?

Retired Gen. Keith Kellogg, a representative of former President Donald trump, has suggested a plan to partition Ukraine into different zones, each under the control of a major world power.Gen. Kellogg believes this approach could bring an end to the ongoing conflict with Russia.

The proposal, outlined in an interview, envisions:

  • No U.S. ground forces
  • The Dnipro River serving as a natural dividing line
  • An 18-mile demilitarized zone
  • Peace enforced by a coalition of the willing nations, led by Anglo-French troops.

Echoes of the Past: The Berlin Analogy

Gen. Kellogg drew a parallel to post-World War II berlin, stating:

We could do it like we did with Berlin after World War II, where there was a Russian, French, British, and American zone.
Gen. Keith Kellogg

Though, this analogy could be seen as symbolically provocative, notably with the 80th anniversary of VE (Victory in Europe) Day approaching. The comparison to Nazi germany might be rejected by Ukraine, considering Russia’s justification for the war.

Stumbling Blocks: Ukrainian and Russian Positions

The proposed plan faces potential rejection from both Ukraine and Russia. Russia seeks Ukraine’s withdrawal from four regions and abandonment of NATO aspirations. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has consistently refused to cede territory. He has stated firmly that Ukraine would not give away any of its land to make peace.

Adding another layer of complexity, President Vladimir Putin has suggested Ukraine should be placed under external management, implying international oversight.

Conflicting Proposals and Diplomatic Maneuvering

Amidst the ongoing conflict, a Ukrainian official revealed that Russia had offered the West a deal: cessation of hostilities in exchange for recognizing Russian-controlled territories and preventing Ukraine’s NATO membership. This proposal also included the deployment of international peacekeepers along the front lines.

Moreover, Steve Witkoff, another Trump envoy, recently met with Putin in Moscow. The Kremlin confirmed discussions on issues related to Ukraine, but provided no further details. While Trump has publicly pressured Russia to end the war, the Kremlin has cautioned against expecting any breakthroughs.

The Reality on the Ground

The war in Ukraine has now spanned more than three years. Russia currently controls approximately 20% of Ukrainian territory, primarily in the eastern regions. The conflict has resulted in millions of displaced persons and a significant loss of life.

While Gen. Kellogg acknowledged that Putin might reject the plan, he maintained that monitoring the demilitarized zone would be feasible. He also suggested holding elections in Ukraine after a ceasefire, emphasizing that this decision ultimately rests with the Ukrainian people.

Reactions and Future Prospects

The viability of Gen. Kellogg’s plan remains uncertain. Many Ukrainian officials reportedly oppose the proposal, arguing that it would reward Russia for its aggression and undermine the principle of national self-determination.

The situation remains fluid, with diplomatic efforts continuing alongside ongoing military operations. the path to a lasting peace in Ukraine remains elusive (3).

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.