YouTube Copyright Enforcement Under Scrutiny in India Over Fair Use Concerns
Concerns are mounting in India over YouTube’s copyright enforcement policies,particularly regarding their impact on content creators utilizing fair use principles. The debate intensified after a May 2025 incident involving news agency Asian News International (ANI) issuing copyright strikes against YouTubers, raising questions about transparency and creator safeguards. Calls are growing for YouTube to align its practices with Indian copyright law, ensuring fair treatment and protecting freedom of expression.
Background: Copyright Claims and Creator Concerns
The controversy began when The Reporters’ Collective reported that ANI had targeted several journalists on YouTube with copyright strikes for using clips of its content. In some instances, ANI allegedly demanded financial compensation to retract the strikes, raising concerns about potential coercion. This sparked a wave of responses from other YouTubers who shared similar experiences of facing pressure or demands in exchange for strike retractions.
One content creator, Mohak Mangal, claimed that ANI issued two copyright strikes against him for using brief clips, including one lasting only nine seconds. He alleged that ANI initially demanded ₹4.8 million (approximately $57,000 USD) in penalties and licensing fees to remove the strikes, threatening further action that could lead to his channel’s termination. Mangal cited an instance where he received a copyright strike for a video on a rape case in Kolkata, where he used just 11 seconds of ANI footage within a 16-minute video.
Did You Know? YouTube’s Content ID system scans over 100 years of video every day to find potential copyright matches.
YouTube’s Copyright Enforcement System
YouTube’s copyright enforcement system relies heavily on automated tools, including Content ID and user-submitted takedown notices. While automation is essential for managing the platform’s scale, it frequently enough prioritizes copyright holders, potentially disadvantaging smaller creators.The Copyright Management System includes tools like webforms, the Copyright Match Tool, and Content ID, all designed to prevent the re-upload of matching content.
Under YouTube’s current policy, a channel that receives three copyright strikes within 90 days faces termination within seven days. This can occur even when the claims are contestable, without providing creators an adequate opportunity to respond before penalties are imposed. This approach bypasses the principle of audi alteram partem,a cornerstone of natural justice that requires both sides to be heard before a decision is made.
Pro Tip: Always keep detailed records of your content creation process, including sources and licenses, to defend against potential copyright claims.
Fair use and Indian copyright Law
While YouTube references fair use doctrines from various jurisdictions, its policies remain vague on how Indian copyright law is applied on the platform in India. The Copyright Act, 1957, provides exceptions under Section 52, including the “fair dealing” clause that protects content used for:
- Parody and satire
- Commentary and criticism
- News reporting
- Educational purposes
However, YouTube’s enforcement often does not reflect these domestic legal protections, leaving Indian creators vulnerable to takedowns and demonetization, often without explanation. This lack of transparency forces creators to live with the consequences, often at the mercy of claimants whose motives may not always be in good faith.
in one case highlighted by The Reporters’ Collective, Ramit Verma, creator of satirical YouTube channels Official PeeingHuman and kroordarshan, faced copyright violation notices from ANI targeting 14 of his videos. YouTube initially expressed concern to ANI that the takedown requests might not be valid, citing the “fair dealing” provisions under Indian copyright law.However, after ANI submitted a detailed response, YouTube sided with ANI on two videos, blocking them, while rejecting claims for the other 12.when Ramit contested this,YouTube did not provide a transparent rationale for the differing outcome.
Such inconsistent enforcement demonstrates the lack of institutional checks and arbitrary case-by-case outcomes, contributing to a climate of fear and self-censorship, especially for creators engaging in political commentary and satire.
Calls for Reform
Advocates are urging YouTube to align its copyright enforcement mechanisms with Indian legal standards. This includes clarifying fair dealing tests, updating copyright help pages to reflect India-specific provisions, and improving the redressal process for creators facing copyright claims. The goal is to ensure that copyright enforcement serves as a shield for rights holders, not a sword against legitimate speech.
According to a 2023 report by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, automated copyright enforcement systems often lead to the removal of legitimate content due to algorithmic errors and biases.
Key Issues in YouTube Copyright Enforcement in India
| Issue | Description |
|---|---|
| Lack of Transparency | YouTube’s rationale behind copyright decisions is often unclear, leaving creators in the dark. |
| Inconsistent Enforcement | Fair use principles are not consistently applied,leading to arbitrary outcomes. |
| Automated Takedowns | Automated systems prioritize copyright holders, potentially disadvantaging smaller creators. |
| Limited Redressal | Creators have limited opportunities to contest claims before penalties are imposed. |
What steps should YouTube take to improve transparency in its copyright enforcement process? How can creators better protect themselves from unfair copyright claims?
Evergreen Insights: The Evolution of Copyright Law and Digital Platforms
The intersection of copyright law and digital platforms like YouTube presents ongoing challenges. Customary copyright frameworks, designed for physical media, struggle to adapt to the speed and scale of online content sharing. The rise of user-generated content and the ease of digital reproduction have created a complex landscape where fair use and copyright infringement frequently enough blur.
historically, copyright law has sought to balance the rights of creators with the public interest, allowing for certain uses of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, commentary, and education. Though, the application of these principles in the digital age requires careful consideration of factors such as the transformative nature of the use, the amount of the work used, and the potential impact on the market for the original work.
As digital platforms continue to evolve, it is crucial to develop copyright enforcement mechanisms that are both effective in protecting intellectual property and fair in safeguarding the rights of creators and the public.
Frequently Asked Questions About YouTube Copyright in India
- What is a copyright strike on YouTube?
- A copyright strike is a warning that YouTube issues when a copyright holder notifies them that a user has uploaded content that infringes on their copyright. Three copyright strikes can lead to channel termination.
- How can I avoid copyright strikes on YouTube?
- To avoid copyright strikes, ensure you have the necessary rights or permissions to use any copyrighted material in your videos. This includes music, video clips, and images. Utilize royalty-free resources or seek permission from the copyright holder.
- What is the difference between copyright infringement and fair use?
- Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. Fair use, under section 52 of the Indian Copyright act, 1957, allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
- What should I do if I receive a copyright strike on YouTube?
- If you believe you have received a copyright strike in error, you can submit a counter-notification to YouTube. You will need to provide a valid reason why you believe the claim is invalid, such as fair use or that you have the necessary permissions.
- How long does a copyright strike last on YouTube?
- A copyright strike remains on your channel for 90 days. After 90 days,the strike expires,but YouTube keeps a record of past strikes.
Share your thoughts on YouTube’s copyright policies in the comments below. Subscribe for more updates on digital rights and content creation!
