Home » Business » Title: California Wildfire Fund: Customers Face $9 Billion Increase

Title: California Wildfire Fund: Customers Face $9 Billion Increase

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

California Electric ‌Customers Face ⁢Increased Costs to‌ Bolster Wildfire Fund

California electric customers ‌are poised to contribute an additional $9​ billion to teh ⁤state’s wildfire fund, pending a vote expected Saturday morning. Amendments to ⁢Senate Bill 254, necessary for‌ the bill’s passage, require a 72-hour public review⁣ period, delaying the vote. The fund,established⁣ in 2019 via⁤ Assembly Bill⁢ 1054,aims to shield the state’s three major investor-owned utilities -⁣ edison International,Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E),and Sempra‌ (parent company of San ‌Diego Gas & Electric) – from bankruptcy in the event of wildfire damages caused by their equipment.

The increased funding is driven ⁢by potential payouts related to the ongoing examination into the Eaton fire, with insured property losses⁣ estimated between ‌$15.2 billion ‌(state officials’ estimate) and $24-$45 billion (UCLA study). Under current law, Edison could be responsible for only a fraction, or even ⁣none, of‍ the damages if its equipment is steadfast to have sparked the fire.A leading theory suggests a ⁣re-energized,century-old⁣ transmission‌ line⁢ may⁣ have caused the blaze.

While the additional cost is unwelcome news for ratepayers⁢ – who already pay the country’s ⁤second-highest electric rates – some provisions within the bill aim to ⁣mitigate the financial impact. Utilities will be required to finance expensive transmission projects through lower-cost public financing, ‌perhaps saving ratepayers billions ​of dollars.Furthermore, half of the $18 billion​ added to⁤ the fund will‍ come from utility shareholders. the plan ⁣also mandates that the three ⁢utilities​ spend billions more on wildfire ​prevention measures without being able ​to‍ profit from⁣ those investments.

Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris (D-irvine), co-author​ of the bill, defended the late-stage amendments, citing the urgency of bolstering the fund as California’s wildfire season ⁤begins. She ⁣noted that many ⁢of the ⁣added provisions had been previously debated ‍in public hearings.

Mark Toney, executive director‌ of the Utility reform Network, a consumer group, expressed disappointment but indicated his institution would ⁢support the bill despite it⁣ “falling short of addressing ​the growing⁣ affordability crisis.”

Governor Newsom’s office shared an outline of the ​plan in ​July,and spokesman ‍Daniel Villasenor confirmed the amendments will proceed through the standard ⁣legislative process. News of the plan led to a rise in share ‍prices ⁣for Edison International, ‌Pacific Gas & Electric, and ‌Sempra on Wednesday.

It’s crucial to note that the ⁤wildfire fund⁢ only covers customers of Edison, PG&E, and⁢ San Diego Gas & Electric, and‌ only these three‌ utilities benefit from its protective measures. Damages from the palisades fire, which occurred on the same day⁢ as the​ Eaton fire, are not covered ⁣as ‍the affected ⁢area is serviced⁣ by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, a municipal utility.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.