Thousands March in London Protesting Proposed Digital IDs
LONDON - Thousands of demonstrators marched through central London on Saturday, October 19, 2024, voicing opposition to government plans for a new digital identification system. The protest, which drew participants from a range of civil liberties groups and political factions, comes as the government weighs the rollout of a digital ID scheme intended to streamline access to services and possibly address illegal immigration.
The proposed digital IDs have ignited a debate over privacy, civil liberties, and potential government overreach. Critics fear the system could lead to increased surveillance and erode essential freedoms, while proponents argue it offers a more secure and efficient way to verify identity. The demonstration underscores growing public concern about the implications of such a system, with opposition mounting from across the political spectrum.
The Metropolitan Police directed protesters to adhere to a pre-approved route and remain on the left side of the road throughout the demonstration.
Conservative former minister Sir David Davis, a long-time opponent of ID cards, stated, “While digital IDs and ID cards sound like modern and efficient solutions to problems like illegal immigration, such claims are misleading at best. The systems involved are profoundly perilous to the privacy and fundamental freedoms of the British people.”
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has dismissed the plans as a “gimmick that will do nothing to stop the boats,” referring to the issue of illegal immigration across the English Channel. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has also expressed firm opposition to the proposals. The liberal Democrats have indicated they would not support a mandatory digital ID system that compels individuals to surrender private data for everyday activities.
The protest follows previous demonstrations and increasing scrutiny of the digital ID plans,which have been under consideration for several months. The government has yet to finalize its approach, and the future of the scheme remains uncertain as public debate continues.
