Home » News » Officials Stonewall Case Dismissal

Officials Stonewall Case Dismissal

Police Decline Investigation Into Threats Alleged by Parliamentarian">

VILNIUS – May 29, 2024 – Vilnius police have declined to investigate allegations concerning threats made against Lithuanian parliamentarian R. Žemaitaitis. The decision follows a report by Žemaitaitis and subsequent review.The focal point of the complaint lies in two Facebook posts. The police’s decision can be appealed, and further details can be expected as the case evolves and facts come to light.

video-container">

Lithuanian Police Decline to Investigate Threats Alleged by Parliamentarian

Vilnius police have declined to initiate a pre-trial investigation into alleged threats made against R. Žemaitaitis, a member of the Lithuanian parliament, by Š. Jasiukevičius, a public figure. The decision, initially made on wednesday, followed a written response from Jasiukevičius and a review of the available materials, according to Gintarė Vitkauskaitė-Šatkauskienė, a senior specialist in the General Prosecutor’s Office Communication Division.

The Core of the Complaint: Facebook Posts

Žemaitaitis’s complaint stemmed from two Facebook posts made by Jasiukevičius on March 15.The first post sharply criticized 18 members of the Seimas (Lithuanian Parliament) for not supporting the extension of sanctions against Russia, labeling them Stalin’s sun bearers. The second post shared a 2016 article co-authored by Jasiukevičius and Albertas Daugirdas, an instructor at the Riflemen’s Union Reserve Training Center, discussing how to deal with collaborators aiding occupiers in destroying Lithuania’s independence during wartime.

Did you know? The Riflemen’s Union is a paramilitary organization in Lithuania with a long history of defending the country’s interests.

Jasiukevičius added that the nearly decade-old text was even more relevant today. Žemaitaitis apparently interpreted the article about strict measures against collaborators as a personal threat, prompting him to contact the police.However, neither the original article nor Jasiukevičius’s Facebook post explicitly mentioned Žemaitaitis.

Parliamentarian’s Reaction and Initial Investigation

Žemaitaitis,known for controversial statements and actions perceived as beneficial to Russia,filed a police report on March 20. Police investigators initially decided not to initiate a pre-trial investigation. though, Vilnius District Prosecutor Gediminas Jukna overturned this decision on May 21, ordering Jasiukevičius to be questioned.

Following the questioning, the police again decided not to proceed with a pre-trial investigation. This decision, like the previous one, can be appealed to the Prosecutor’s Office.

Controversial Statements and Context

Amidst russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Žemaitaitis sparked public outrage by stating that he would provide Russian forces with the coordinates of his political opponents’ homes, effectively aiding an occupying force in destroying Lithuania. Despite this, a criminal case was not initiated against Žemaitaitis at that time.

Pro tip: In legal terms, a threat must be direct and unambiguous to warrant criminal investigation. Vague or implied threats are frequently enough insufficient.

Jasiukevičius’s Response

Following Žemaitaitis’s police report, Jasiukevičius provided a written statement to the police and addressed the parliamentarian in a video posted on Facebook, employing sharp irony.He stated:

Remyguti,zuikeli,gali miegoti ramiai,gali prieš miegą tikrai nežiūrėti,ar po lova manęs nėra. Aš tikrai tavęs negaudysiu ir tikrai tavęs nemušiu. Tikrai nuogo tavęs iš mašinos neišmetinėsiu ir tikrai nuogo tavęs miesto aikštėje aš tavęs nepririšinėsiu su lentele „kolaborantas”, nes kad būtum kolaborantas, reikia, kad Lietuva būtų okupuota, kad tu galėtum bendradarbiauti su kolaborantu. Nežinau, kodėl sau prisiskyrei šį vaidmenį – galbūt turi kažkokių minčių ir bijai dėl savo ateities
Š. Jasiukevičius

frequently Asked Questions

Why did the police decline to investigate?
The police found no objective data indicating a crime had been committed under Article 145 of the Criminal Code (Threatening to kill or seriously injure a person or terrorizing a person).
What was the basis of Žemaitaitis’s complaint?
Žemaitaitis cited two Facebook posts by Jasiukevičius, one criticizing parliament members and another sharing an older article about dealing with collaborators.
Can the decision not to investigate be appealed?
yes, the decision can be appealed to the Prosecutor’s Office.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.