Home » Entertainment » Moni Ovadia: Zionism, Exile, and the Palestinian Cause

Moni Ovadia: Zionism, Exile, and the Palestinian Cause

Moni Ovadia on ⁢Exile,⁣ Nationalism, Israel & Palestine: “Trump’s Peace is Fake”

Moni Ovadia frames exile as a profoundly leveling experience, stating it strips away societal markers and reveals the basic commonality of humanity: “in exile the ​man seeks the eyes of the other man, not ‌his wallet. ‍It doesn’t count where you come from, but who you are. ​The exile makes⁢ you ⁤understand that you are only a man on this land and nothing​ else,‌ which ‍for this reason every man is the⁤ same as the other. It could ​also be said that ⁢the‌ concept of exile is the first step of democracy.”

He sharply contrasts this with nationalism, which he‌ denounces ⁤as “a metastase, the ⁢worst form of cancer that kills men since ​the beginning of time.” When asked if⁣ Zionism falls into this category,Ovadia responds affirmatively,acknowledging its complexity. He notes a link to religious fanaticism,while ​together pointing‌ out the‌ existence of ultra-Orthodox Jewish groups fundamentally opposed to Zionism and the state of Israel.

Specifically, he⁣ cites Naturei Karta, ⁤a militant group that views Israel as both criminally inhumane and religiously blasphemous. They advocate for ‍the peaceful ⁢dismantling of Israel and consistently side with the Palestinians. ⁣Ovadia highlights ⁣a recent “World Congress of the ‍anti-zionist ‌Jews” held in vienna, noting its lack​ of media coverage due to‍ the influence of⁢ “Zionist lobbies” who, he claims, suppress dissenting Jewish voices.He states he himself has experienced ⁣professional repercussions – being excluded from television appearances – ⁤due to his critical stance ‌on Zionism.

Regarding his familiarity with ⁢Israel, Ovadia recounts ‌having served as a correspondent for Corriere della Sera between ⁤1999 and 2000, but admits he doesn’t claim to know the state “thoroughly,” and that it never‌ convinced him, “well before the events of the last 2‌ years.” He argues Israel cannot​ be considered a democracy due to its “segregationist” ⁣nature. He criticizes the lack of defined borders, suggesting it allowed for unchecked action and that a​ return to the 1949 armistice lines would have prevented the​ current situation.

Ovadia dismisses the argument‍ that⁣ Israel is the only democracy‌ in the Middle ‌East, ​deeming it “unbearable” and drawing a​ parallel to justifications ⁤for collective punishment based on the ‍practices of other religions.

Within the italian political landscape, Ovadia expresses affinity‌ for Paolo Ferrero, some female members of the 5 Star movement like Chiara Appendino, ⁣and possibly Giuseppe conte,⁢ believing dialog is possible with them despite holding ⁢more radical views.

Despite a growing sense of weariness at nearly ‌80 ​years ⁢old,Ovadia remains committed to advocating for Palestine,which he describes ⁤as “one of the greatest injustices in history.” He expresses diminished ‍hope following the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, but now places his​ hopes in the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, plus recently Indonesia). He concludes with a firm declaration: “I will not stop my militancy for⁢ Palestine… It is indeed a‌ mandatory commitment.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.