Europe & Multilateralism: Navigating a New World Order (2026)
Brussels, March 21, 2026 – A recent speech by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen advocating for a “more realistic and interest-driven foreign policy” has triggered a political crisis within the European Union, raising questions about the future of the bloc’s commitment to multilateralism. The speech, delivered at the EU Ambassadors’ Conference in Brussels last week, prompted an immediate rebuke from European Council President Antonio Costa and fueled rumors of a potential motion of censure in the European Parliament, according to reports from Inter Press Service.
Von der Leyen’s remarks, which included the assertion that “Europe can no longer be a custodian for the vintage-world order, for a world that has gone and will not return,” were swiftly retracted in full. However, the initial fallout has exposed deep divisions within the EU regarding its approach to a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape. The controversy centers on whether the President’s words represented a miscalculation or a deliberate shift towards a foreign policy more aligned with perceived “Trumpian chaos and the authoritarian impulses emanating from Beijing and Moscow,” as described by Manuel Manonelles, Associate Professor of International Relations at Blanquerna-Ramon Llull University in Spain.
Sources in Brussels suggest the speech was, in part, an attempt to align the EU’s position with the views previously held by German Chancellor Merz regarding closer alignment with the United States. However, recent reports indicate Merz’s own approval ratings have plummeted, falling to 26%, a level comparable to those seen during Donald Trump’s presidency.
The timing of Von der Leyen’s address is particularly sensitive, occurring amidst escalating geopolitical tensions including ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, as well as instability in Venezuela. Manonelles argues that it was troubling to observe the head of the European Commission articulating a position so divergent from the EU’s foundational principles, built on the lessons of the Second World War and opposition to totalitarian regimes.
While acknowledging the current crisis facing multilateral institutions like the United Nations, Manonelles cautioned against adopting the mindset of those contributing to the deterioration of the international order. He emphasized the importance of strategic autonomy for Europe, not only in defense but also in securing independence in technological goods and services, where current reliance on the United States borders on “vassalage.”
Manonelles further argued that strengthening strategic alliances, particularly with countries like India and Mercosur, is crucial for Europe. However, he firmly rejected the notion that Europe’s future lies in a weakening of the international order, asserting that multilateralism remains essential for addressing global challenges such as climate change, migration, public health and the impact of artificial intelligence.
The European Commission has not issued further comment on the matter since President von der Leyen’s retraction. No date has been set for a potential vote of censure in the European Parliament.