Aisha Nayla, a recent political science intern at the National Civic League’s Center for Democratic Innovation, has completed research into the evolving role of artificial intelligence in civic life. Her work comes as concerns mount over the potential for AI to be used for malicious purposes during elections, with a 2024 Pew Research Center survey finding 39 percent of Americans were highly concerned about this possibility.
Nayla’s research, and a growing body of analysis, highlights a paradox: while public anxiety regarding AI’s impact on democracy is increasing, so too is recognition of its potential to strengthen democratic systems. This potential spans election processes, digital governance, and broader civic engagement, according to the National Civic League.
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace notes that artificial intelligence – specifically large language models – is increasingly being utilized by governments and civic institutions as a tool for public engagement and policymaking. This development occurs alongside warnings that AI expansion could pose a substantial threat to democratic values, as outlined in research published by Taylor & Francis Online.
The concerns surrounding AI’s apply in democratic processes are multifaceted. The ease with which AI can generate content raises questions about the integrity of information and the potential for manipulation. Several countries, including the Philippines, Myanmar, and the United States, have been cited as embracing AI-powered surveillance technologies, raising concerns about digital authoritarianism. The speed at which AI can create content too presents challenges to democratic discourse and election integrity.
Despite these risks, experts are exploring how AI can be harnessed for democratic innovation. Local governments, consulting platforms, and civic societies are beginning to experiment with AI-driven solutions to enhance participation, equity, and productivity in democratic processes. The EPTA Network has identified key areas of focus, including the use of AI in political campaigning, public debate, and within parliaments and the public sector.
The debate over AI and democracy extends to the question of governance and control. Ensuring democratic oversight of AI development and deployment is seen as crucial to mitigating potential risks and maximizing benefits. The Carnegie Endowment suggests that innovative approaches to public engagement, facilitated by AI, could revitalize democratic governance.
As of March 3, 2026, no comprehensive international framework for governing the use of AI in democratic processes has been established. Discussions continue regarding the necessitate for regulations and ethical guidelines to address the challenges posed by this rapidly evolving technology.
