Scholz Admits Delay in LNG Terminal Construction Was an Error Amid Nord Stream inquiry
Berlin – German Chancellor Olaf Scholz acknowledged November 21, 2025, that the prolonged postponement of liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal construction represented a strategic misstep, as investigations continue into the 2022 sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The admission comes as German authorities grapple with energy security concerns and heightened scrutiny surrounding the Nord Stream attacks, with a recent arrest in Germany linked to the case.
The delayed buildout of LNG infrastructure left Germany heavily reliant on Russian gas imports for years, a vulnerability underscored by the Nord Stream pipeline explosions and subsequent disruptions to energy supplies. Scholz’s statement signals a shift in acknowledging past policy decisions and a renewed focus on diversifying energy sources. The Investigative Committee of Nord Stream 2 has been examining the circumstances surrounding the pipeline damage, and the arrest of a Ukrainian national, Serhiy K., on suspicion of involvement is intensifying pressure for answers.
The Nord Stream 2 pipeline, completed but never operational, was designed to double the capacity of Russian gas deliveries directly to germany. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Germany suspended the project’s certification. In September 2022, both Nord Stream 1 and 2 suffered underwater explosions, rendering them unusable.
German authorities have been investigating the incident, and recent developments include the arrest of Serhiy K. in Germany, accused of potentially being involved in the sabotage.According to reports, investigators allege he may have been part of a small team tasked with preparing the attack. The investigation is ongoing, and the full extent of the alleged sabotage operation remains unclear.
Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder has publicly commented on the investigation, stating, “This event is slowly becoming ridiculous,” reflecting growing frustration with the pace and clarity of the inquiry.The case has significant implications for Germany’s relationship with Ukraine, as well as broader geopolitical dynamics in the region.
