Home » News » Judge Challenges Trump’s Acting U.S. Attorney Appointment in Comey, James Cases

Judge Challenges Trump’s Acting U.S. Attorney Appointment in Comey, James Cases

by Emma Walker – News Editor

## Judge‍ Hears​ Challenge to Trump-Appointed Prosecutor in Comey and ⁢James Cases

A federal judge‌ is ⁤currently ‍considering‍ a challenge to the‍ appointment of‌ Lindsey Halligan, the prosecutor ⁣overseeing the cases​ against former FBI Director James Comey and New⁤ York Attorney General Letitia James.⁢ The challenge centers on whether Halligan​ was lawfully appointed to her position ⁢by⁣ former President Donald Trump.Halligan indicted Comey on a bank ⁢fraud charge⁢ just days before⁣ the five-year⁢ statute ​of limitations expired. The Justice Department‌ argues ​the indictment should⁤ stand, citing U.S. Code 3288, which allows for a​ new indictment within‍ six months of a dismissal if the original was filed ⁤after​ the statute‌ of limitations had lapsed. Legal experts ‍suggest this ⁣six-month grace period could‍ be key​ to continuing⁤ the prosecution, as the bank fraud charge ⁣falls within the ten-year statute of ⁣limitations.

The case stems from media ‌scrutiny surrounding an FBI examination into the Clinton Foundation, where Comey previously stated, ⁢”I stand by the testimony.” Trump and Comey clashed during Trump’s first term over the handling of the investigation into alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, leading ‌to ⁣Comey’s firing in May 2017 ‍and subsequent criticism​ of Trump.

Recent actions by Bondi, a Trump appointee, aim to solidify Halligan’s ‍position. On October 31st, ‍Bondi issued an order retroactively appointing Halligan as a “special attorney” within the Department of Justice, effective September 22nd – three days ⁣before Comey’s indictment. The order further delegates authority ‍to ⁤Halligan to prosecute both comey ⁤and⁢ James.

Halligan is also ‍facing ethics⁢ complaints filed​ by the Campaign⁤ for Accountability, a left-leaning⁤ watchdog group, with Bar Associations in Florida and ⁣Virginia.​ The complaint alleges “an abuse of power” that “undermine[s] the integrity of the department of Justice” and erodes⁢ public trust.

This challenge to Halligan’s appointment is part of a broader pattern of legal challenges to⁢ appointments made by Trump. ‍In late September, a Nevada judge disqualified acting U.S. Attorney ⁤Sigal Chattah for violating the⁢ Federal Vacancies ‌Reform⁣ Act. ‌Similarly, in August,‍ a New Jersey ⁤judge ruled Alina‌ Habba was “not lawfully holding the office of United states Attorney”⁢ after her 120-day interim appointment expired, possibly voiding actions taken during her⁣ time⁣ as the top federal prosecutor.

Letitia James, ​the New York Attorney General currently being prosecuted by Halligan, ​previously sued Trump and his ‍businesses‍ for fraud in 2022.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.