Home » World » European IPOs Lagging Behind US and Asia: A Deep Dive

European IPOs Lagging Behind US and Asia: A Deep Dive

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Key Takeaways ‍from ‍the Article: ‌European IPO Market Struggles

This article paints a picture of a struggling European IPO market, contrasted with the ⁣more vibrant US market. here’s a breakdown of the key⁤ points:

1. Slow & Risky European IPO Process:

* ⁢ Going public⁤ in Europe is a​ lengthy⁣ process (3-12 months) and vulnerable to market fluctuations.
* ‍Even small negative events (peer company performance, market ⁤swings) can derail deals and impact valuations.
*‍ European markets are underperforming compared to the ​US, China, and Japan, hampered by lack of ⁢AI investment and⁤ geopolitical concerns.

2. Preference for M&A:

* Private Equity (PE) ‌firms, major backers of European ‍IPOs, increasingly favor the⁤ certainty of Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) deals over the risk of a failed IPO.
* sponsors who retain ownership ‍after an IPO are​ particularly concerned about aftermarket stock performance.

3. “Quality Filter” & Company Readiness:

* Ther’s ​a ‌shortage of European companies‍ ready for public scrutiny. ⁢The market is⁤ now⁣ more ​selective (“quality filter”) than in the boom⁢ of 2021.
* ‍ Many PE-backed ⁣companies ​lack the “consistency of returns”⁢ demanded by public markets and are better suited‍ to remain⁣ private.
* ⁤ Accomplished IPOs like Galderma (EQT’s skincare company) demonstrate that ⁣ high-quality assets can still ⁢thrive.

4.US Market Dominance:

*​ Global IPO pipeline is‍ up 2% but capital is flowing to the US due to ​its “depth and liquidity.”
* Europe suffers from regulatory fragmentation – a patchwork of national regulators creates complexity compared to⁢ the unified‌ SEC oversight in the US.
* ⁤ Capital-intensive industries ⁣(AI, ⁣energy transition) are drawn to the US for the massive funding they require.

5. Nuances & Potential for ⁢Improvement:

* A truly strong business can succeed in Europe (Klarna example). The US listing isn’t always ⁣a sign a⁢ company can’t list in Europe, but rather an optimization strategy.
* ​ ⁢The pipeline for 2026/2027 is building, suggesting potential for future ⁢IPO activity.

In essence, the article suggests that the European IPO market is facing‌ headwinds due to a ‌combination ‍of economic factors,⁣ regulatory challenges, and a lack of sufficiently prepared companies. While not entirely ​bleak, it‍ highlights a⁣ clear preference for the US market for​ significant ⁢capital raises.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.