Home » World » ‘Water off a duck’s back’: will Israel’s growing isolation make its leadership change course? | Israel

‘Water off a duck’s back’: will Israel’s growing isolation make its leadership change course? | Israel

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Growing International Pressure Fails to Shift ‌Israeli Policy Despite Mounting Isolation

TEL AVIV – Despite ⁢a surge in international ⁣sanctions​ and growing calls for a ceasefire, israel shows few signs of altering it’s current course regarding the conflict in Gaza and the West Bank, ​prompting questions about the effectiveness of external pressure on ⁣its leadership. A growing number of artists and filmmakers have ​pledged​ to boycott ‌Israeli film institutions,citing their alleged “implication in genocide… against the Palestinian‍ people,” while others,including Liev Schreiber and Debra Messing,have defended the Israeli film and⁣ TV industry as frequently critical of government policy.

The boycott movement, active for two years, is expected to intensify with the implementation of further sanctions. “It is something that ⁤has existed ​for two years but with the⁣ sanctions rolling ⁤in, we will be seeing a lot more ⁣of it,”⁤ stated Addam Yekutieli, a Tel Aviv-based artist known for his opposition to​ the Israeli offensive in Gaza and the⁢ nearly ⁣50-year occupation of the West Bank. ​Yekutieli noted a defensive reaction ⁣within Israel,hindering critical self-reflection,and⁢ a prevailing ⁢expectation of a return to “normal” following the conflict.

Recent polling data reveals a divided Israeli ​public. While 59% of Israelis‍ express⁤ concern over being barred from cultural and sporting events, this concern is considerably higher among opposition voters. Approximately half of Israelis believe the fighting in Gaza shoudl cease and prioritize the release of hostages.

Analysts are drawing parallels ‌to the international sanctions imposed on apartheid South africa, which ultimately contributed‌ to the regime’s collapse despite ⁢US support. the comparison is ⁢contentious, ⁢as Israel faces accusations from human rights organizations of implementing an apartheid system in its ‍treatment of Palestinians in⁢ the occupied West Bank and, according​ to some, within⁢ israel⁢ itself.

Itamar Eichner, a commentator for Yedioth Ahronoth, argued⁢ that ‌South Africa‘s dismantling of apartheid stemmed‍ not from international pressure, ⁢but from a realization that “real and lasting solutions” were‍ necessary.He suggests Israel now faces a similar pivotal moment.

However, sanctions ​comparable to those leveled against‍ South⁤ Africa have yet to materialize,​ and the Israeli‍ economy has proven surprisingly resilient, bolstered by ‍substantial government spending financed through borrowing.⁢ According to the⁢ OECD, the Israeli economy has demonstrated relative ‌strength ⁤despite the ongoing conflict.

Yossi Mekelberg, of London’s Chatham House, emphasized the psychological‌ impact of the October 7th ⁢attacks ‌on Israelis and the “terrible catastrophe” facing Palestinians, but stressed the‌ need for ​Israelis‌ to ⁣recognise a shift ⁤in the international landscape. “Yes,⁣ Israelis are psychologically⁣ still on 7 ⁤October [2023] ⁤ and in trauma, ‌Palestinians⁤ are⁢ in the terrible catastrophe that they are facing. But Israelis also need to understand ​the‌ tide has changed.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.