Doubts Surround Potential Nobel Peace Prize for Former President Trump
The claim by a former president that he “ended seven wars and is about to conclude an eighth” has been met wiht considerable skepticism. The former president, during a speech to military personnel in virginia, expressed frustration that the Nobel Peace prize might be awarded to someone who has “done absolutely nothing.” Though, the Nobel Committee’s established criteria suggest a different outcome.
Analysts from Oslo and Stockholm contend that the former president’s actions are at odds with the principles of international cooperation and disarmament that underpinned Alfred Nobel’s legacy. Nina Graeger, director of the Oslo Peace Research Institute, stated that the president’s policies “go against what is written in Alfred Nobel’s will,” particularly concerning international cooperation, brotherhood of nations and disarmament.
During his time in office, the former president withdrew the United States from several multilateral treaties, initiated trade disputes with both allies and adversaries, publicly considered acquiring greenland, and deployed troops domestically. He also pursued legal action against universities and media outlets. “The list of actions that do not align with the ideals of the Nobel Peace Prize is long,” Graeger emphasized.
Jorgen Watne Frydnes, head of the Nobel Committee, clarified that the jury considers ”the entire career of a person or institution,” with primary focus on “what they specifically do for peace.”
Despite multiple nominations – including one from Republican Congresswoman Claudia Tenney recognizing the 2020 Abraham Accords – experts believe the former president’s chances of winning are slim.
Theo Zenou, a historian and researcher at the Henry Jackson Society, explained that the committee favors “sustained peace efforts over quick diplomatic victories.” He highlighted the distinction between achieving a temporary ceasefire and addressing the underlying causes of conflict.Zenou also noted that the former president’s position on climate change is a notable obstacle. “I don’t think they’ll give the most prestigious award in the world to someone who doesn’t believe in climate change,” he said, adding that previous laureates have been known for building bridges and fostering international cooperation – qualities not typically associated with the former president.
the committee’s past experience,specifically the 2009 award to Barack Obama just nine months into his presidency,which drew criticism,also plays a role. graeger cautioned that the former president’s open desire for the award could be detrimental,as the committee “doesn’t want to appear to be bowing to political pressure.”
In a world increasingly characterized by fragmentation and militarization, awarding the prize to the former president – whose “America First” policy redefined U.S. foreign policy – appears unlikely. “His rhetoric does not point to a peaceful perspective,” Graeger concluded.
The winner will be announced on Friday, in a year marked by the highest number of active wars as World War II.
AP and AFP Agencies
