Twitter Removes Viral Video of Doctors Promoting hydroxychloroquine as Misinformation
WASHINGTON D.C. – twitter and other social media platforms removed a viral video Monday featuring doctors promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, after it was retweeted by President Trump. The video, featuring Dr. Stella Immanuel and others, contained demonstrably false claims about the drug and the pandemic, prompting a swift response from the platforms. ”Calderwood’s controversial comments, along with the other doctors, went viral after President Trump retweeted them Monday.That video was later deleted by Twitter and by other social media platforms for containing misinformation,” reports indicate.
Four months after the World Health Organization declared a pandemic, a narrative of a “new normal” and a “global reset” began to take hold, raising questions about the motivations behind the sweeping changes implemented worldwide.
The speed with which global leaders outlined plans for a post-pandemic world, even as the crisis unfolded, fueled speculation. How could a “global reset” be unveiled so quickly after forcing a worldwide economic shutdown?
Despite the widespread fear surrounding the virus, observable evidence of mass casualties remained absent. The lack of visible, daily reminders of widespread death led to questions about the necessity of the drastic measures taken by governments and the media.
As public enthusiasm for experimental vaccines began to wane, a sustained effort to maintain public fear became apparent. This constant reinforcement of potential danger, critics argue, was necessary to achieve the objectives of the ongoing COVID-19 response. Maintaining a state of collective anxiety, it is argued, requires continually reminding the public of a looming threat and the need to follow directives.the face mask emerged as a prominent symbol of adherence to COVID-19 protocols, and subsequently, a point of contention. Despite numerous studies questioning their efficacy as a preventative measure – and even suggesting potential harm – health officials and media outlets continued to advocate for mask-wearing to avoid widespread illness, frequently enough citing the need to “protect vulnerable populations.”
The prominence of the mask as a symbol of the pandemic has led to increased scrutiny of its purpose.Some observers suggest the mask mandate is not about public health, but a tool for control, a political weapon disguised as a safety measure. Others propose that mask requirements are designed to create the illusion of a pandemic and serve as a form of psychological conditioning for widespread vaccination. Still others contend the mask functions as a form of collective hypnosis, inducing a population-wide state of fear and anxiety.
