“`html
Wisconsin Governor tony Evers signed the state’s new two-year budget, totaling $111 billion, into law early Thursday morning, July 3, 2025, after it cleared both the Senate and Assembly in an expedited process [1].The budget includes income tax cuts for individuals and retirees, elimination of sales taxes on residential electric bills, and adjustments to fees for driver’s licenses and vehicle titles
A recent Women’s Euro match between Switzerland and Norway (1-2) has ignited debate over time management and the increasing amount of stoppage time in soccer. during the second half,the ball was in play for only 22 minutes,while stoppages consumed over 31 minutes,raising concerns about the impact on the game’s integrity and flow.
Between the 67th and 75th minutes, spectators witnessed a mere 12 seconds of Swiss offensive play following a failed penalty attempt. A handball by Géraldine Reuteler triggered a series of interruptions, including a VAR review, delays by Norwegian players, a refreshment break, and multiple substitutions. These eight minutes exemplify the questionable time management during the match.
Did You Know? The International Football Association Board (IFAB) is responsible for the Laws of the Game, including regulations on added time. They are constantly reviewing the laws to ensure fairness and the integrity of the sport [1].
Alarmingly, almost 60% of the second half was consumed by interruptions. After Norway’s second goal, the ball was in play for a mere 10.5 minutes,compared to 25 minutes of stoppage time. Even the additional time, intended to compensate for disruptions, saw only 3 minutes and 30 seconds of actual play versus 4 minutes and 30 seconds of inactivity.
Pro Tip: Referees often consider factors like injuries,substitutions,penalties,and significant goal celebrations when calculating added time.
in contrast, the first half presented a more balanced scenario. Teams actively played for 28 minutes and 25 seconds, while interruptions accounted for 18 minutes and 27 seconds. This stark difference highlights the unusual amount of stoppage time in the second half.
| Period | Active Play | Stoppage Time |
|---|---|---|
| First Half | 28m 25s | 18m 27s |
| Second Half | 22m | 31m+ |
| Second Half (After Norway’s 2nd Goal) | 10m 30s | 25m |
| Additional Time | 3m 30s | 4m 30s |
While Switzerland may bear some obligation for individual errors that allowed Norway to regain momentum, the excessive stoppages undoubtedly penalized them.The frequent interruptions disrupted the game’s rhythm and potentially favored the Norwegian team’s tactics.
The increasing amount of added time in soccer matches is a growing trend. During the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar, the average amount of added time per match was over 11 minutes, significantly higher than previous tournaments [2]. This trend has sparked debate among players, coaches, and fans alike.
The Switzerland-Norway match serves as a case study for the need to address time management issues in women’s soccer. Streamlining VAR reviews, minimizing player delays, and optimizing substitution procedures could help ensure a fairer and more engaging game for all.
What are yoru thoughts on the increasing amount of stoppage time in soccer? How can the game be improved to ensure a fairer and more enjoyable experience for players and fans?
Time management in soccer has evolved significantly over the years. Initially, added time was primarily intended to compensate for injuries and significant stoppages. Though, with the advent of VAR and increased tactical substitutions, the amount of added time has steadily increased. This has led to debates about the impact on game flow, player fatigue, and the overall viewing experience. FIFA and other governing bodies are continuously evaluating the Laws of the Game to address these concerns and ensure a fair balance between compensating for lost time and maintaining the game’s rhythm.
Share your thoughts on this issue in the comments below and subscribe to World Today News for more in-depth sports analysis!
“`html
Oslo, Norway – A comprehensive electric car range test conducted in Norway reveals that climate plays a meaningful [[1]] role in determining the real-world performance of electric vehicles. The summer 2025 test, organized by the Norwegian NAF Auto Club in collaboration with Motor magazine, saw the Lucid Air, Tesla Model 3, and BMW iX shatter previous range records, demonstrating the potential of electric vehicles under favorable conditions.
The test involved 27 diffrent electric car models, ranging from premium to more affordable options. Conducted on June 30, 2025, the vehicles were driven on a mixed route including municipal roads, district roads, mountain passes, and highways, with speeds limited to 110 km/h (68 mph). The temperature during the test ranged from 7 to 18 degrees Celsius (45 to 64 degrees Fahrenheit), with cloudy skies and occasional showers.
Did You Know? Norway is a global leader in electric vehicle adoption, with over 80% of new car sales being electric in 2022 [[Source: IEA].
Notably, the cars were not driven until complete battery discharge. Instead,the test concluded when the vehicles could no longer maintain the maximum allowed speed. This change in methodology provides a more
Oslo, Norway – In a bold move signaling growing international scrutiny over the conflict in Gaza, Norway’s largest pension fund, KLP, has announced it will divest from both oshkosh Corporation (US) and ThyssenKrupp (Germany) due to concerns their equipment is being used in the ongoing war [[source]].The decision, effective June 2025, impacts approximately $2.8 million in investments.
Key Findings:
Equipment Concerns: KLP cited UN reports indicating both companies supply weapons and equipment to the Israeli military currently deployed in Gaza [[source]].
Oshkosh’s Admission: Oshkosh Corporation reportedly confirmed ongoing sales of vehicles and vehicle parts used by the israeli army in Gaza [[source]].
* ThyssenKrupp’s Deliveries: ThyssenKrupp disclosed a “long-term relationship” with the Israeli military, including the delivery of four Sa’ar 6 warships between 2020-2021 and plans for a submarine delivery later this year
As European nations grapple with military recruitment, Germany confronts a pivotal decision: Should they mandate military service to bolster their armed forces? The debate hinges on balancing national security needs with individual freedoms and public acceptance, a complex issue with potential consequences.
The German government is considering whether enough young citizens will volunteer for military service, akin to the enthusiastic response seen in Norway. This situation could become a significant challenge for the defense minister. The coalition government is divided on the matter, with the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union holding different views than the Social Democrats.
Across Europe, recruitment is proving difficult. The United Kingdom, for example, faces similar hurdles in attracting personnel. Its armed forces currently have 148,230 active-duty members, and the country has struggled to meet its recruitment goals. Despite well-designed campaigns, the numbers haven’t risen significantly.
Many European countries are facing similar recruitment problems. Some nations that have mandatory military service haven’t matched the appeal of Norway, where one-quarter of conscripts opt for active duty.
There is a solution: Ask the teenagers themselves.
Conversations around military service tend to focus on strategies to improve participation. However, the voices of the young people who would be most affected by these policies are often excluded.
