How can I re-add a friend I blocked on Snapchat?

To re-add a friend you previously blocked on snapchat, first, navigate to your Snapchat settings and remove the block. Then, search for their username and send a new friend request. They must accept the request for you to reconnect.

What happens if a friend deleted their Snapchat account?

If a friend has deleted their Snapchat account, it might still appear temporarily.Periodically check Snapchat to see if the account becomes available again. If the account is permanently deleted, you won't be able to add them until they reactivate it.

Is it possible to automatically re-add a friend after unblocking them on Snapchat?

No, after unblocking a friend, you must manually send them a new friend request. Snapchat does not automatically re-add them to your friend list.

What can I do after re-adding a friend on Snapchat?

Once your friend accepts your new friend request, you can resume sending Snaps, chatting, and viewing each other's stories as usual.

What if I removed a friend without blocking them; how do I re-add them on snapchat?

If you removed a friend from your friend list without blocking them, you can simply search for their username and send them a new friend request. Once they accept, they will be added back to your friends list.

How long does a deleted Snapchat account remain visible?

A deleted Snapchat account may remain visible for a short period before being entirely removed from the platform. The duration can vary.

Why did SIAE request a ban on Napster?

SIAE, the Italian Society of Authors and Publishers, requested a national ban on Napster, alleging copyright violations related to protected songs accessible on the platform.

Why did AGCOM reject the SIAE's request to ban Napster?

AGCOM, the Italian Communications Authority, archived the case because the reported copyright violations represented a negligible portion of Napster's overall legal content offerings.

What concerns have been raised about the piracy Shield platform?

Concerns about Piracy Shield include its costs, the lack of independent checks, and the potential for decisions that may not be entirely fair or accurate. Commissioner Elisa Giomi has voiced these perplexities.

What does this Napster decision mean for online copyright protection in Italy?

The Napster decision highlights the need for a balanced approach to online copyright protection, ensuring effectiveness while safeguarding against overly broad or punitive measures. It underscores the importance of due process and careful evaluation of alleged infringements.

Why did President Trump deploy Marines to Los Angeles?

President Trump deployed Marines and the National Guard to Los Angeles in response to massive raids targeting migrants.

What is Governor Newsom's response to the marine deployment?

Governor Gavin Newsom has strongly opposed the deployment, calling it an overreach of federal power and directing the state's legal resources to block it.

What legal actions have been taken to stop the deployment of Marines?

Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass filed an emergency motion to block what they consider the illegal deployment of Marines and the National Guard in Los Angeles.

What is the basis for California's opposition to military presence in law enforcement?

California officials argue that using the military for domestic law enforcement violates essential principles of American civil society, where law enforcement is primarily the responsibility of the police, not the armed forces.

How does this deployment compare to President Trump's previous actions?

President Trump acknowledged that his current actions deviate from past protocols, where he waited for governors to request federal assistance.

Tag:

block

World

IDF Stops Activists on Board Freedom Flotilla – Gaza Crisis

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor July 27, 2025

written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

IDF Stops Activists on Board Freedom Flotilla

Table of Contents

IDF Stops Activists on Board Freedom Flotilla
- Evergreen Insights: freedom Flotilla Context
- Frequently Asked Questions About the Freedom Flotilla

Israeli soldiers boarded the Handala, a vessel operated by the pro-Palestinian Freedom Flotilla movement, while it was en route to Gaza. The interception occurred in international waters, according to a live broadcast from the group. Footage showed pro-Palestinian activists on deck with raised hands,singing the Italian anti-fascist song “Bella Ciao” as soldiers took control of the ship. The live video transmissions were interrupted shortly after.

The Freedom Flotilla Coalition stated on social media that the Handala was “intercepted and illegally boarded by Israeli forces while in international waters.” An online tracking tool indicated the boat’s position was approximately 50 kilometers off the Egyptian coast and 100 kilometers west of Gaza at the time of the interception. The Israeli military had not immediately confirmed the operation, but earlier that day, it had announced its intention to enforce “the legal maritime security blockade on the Gaza Strip.”

The Handala was carrying 19 activists, including European politicians, and two journalists from Al Jazeera, who managed to transmit from the boat until just before the interception. Among those arrested were two French parliamentarians, Emma Foureau and Gabrielle Cathala.Their party leader,Jean-Luc Mélenchon of France Unbowed (LFI),condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “Netanyahu’s delinquents have boarded the Handala. They attacked 21 unarmed people in territorial waters where they have no right. A kidnapping of which two French parliamentarians are victims,” he wrote on X.

Mélenchon urged the French government to intervene. Gaza is currently facing a severe shortage of food and essential goods, with the United Nations and NGOs warning of an impending famine.The Handala crew had declared on X that they would begin a hunger strike if the Israeli army intercepted the boat and detained the passengers. The previous vessel sent by the Freedom Flotilla, the Madleen, was intercepted by the Israeli army in international waters on june 9 and towed to the Israeli port of Ashdod. It was carrying 12 activists,including the well-known Swedish activist Greta Thunberg.

The soldiers of the IDF, who raided the Freedom Flotilla ship, were seen boarding the vessel.

Evergreen Insights: freedom Flotilla Context

the Freedom Flotilla Coalition is an international organization that organizes voyages to challenge the blockade of gaza. These flotillas aim to bring humanitarian aid and raise awareness about the situation in the Palestinian territories. The Handala, named after a famous Palestinian cartoon character, is a symbolic vessel in this movement. Interceptions by Israeli forces have occurred on previous occasions, often leading to international condemnation and diplomatic tensions.

The blockade of Gaza, imposed by Israel and Egypt, has been in place since 2007. International bodies, including the United Nations, have repeatedly called for an end to the blockade, citing its severe impact on the civilian population. The ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza,exacerbated by conflict and restrictions on essential goods,remains a important international concern.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Freedom Flotilla

What is the Freedom Flotilla?
The Freedom Flotilla is a coalition of international organizations and activists who organize maritime missions to challenge the blockade of Gaza and deliver humanitarian aid.

Why was the Handala intercepted?
According to Israel, the interception was part of enforcing the maritime security blockade on the Gaza Strip. The Freedom Flotilla states the interception occurred in international waters.

Who was on board the Handala?
the handala carried 19 activists, including European politicians and two journalists from Al Jazeera.

What are the conditions in Gaza?
Gaza is facing a severe humanitarian crisis, with shortages of food and essential goods, and warnings of an imminent famine.

This article reports on a geopolitical event and dose not constitute health, financial, or legal advice.

what are your thoughts on this interception? Share your perspective in the comments below, and subscribe to World Today News for more updates on global events.

July 27, 2025 0 comments

Business

A large part of the independent branch holders with a Blokker store does not want to continue under the name Blokker. Until today, the franchisees had the time to make a choice about whether or not to keep the name Blokker. Twelve of the 36 independent b

by Priya Shah – Business Editor July 16, 2025

written by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Blokker Franchisees Reject Brand Name in Mass Exodus; Only 12 Remain

Amsterdam, Netherlands – In a notable blow to the revived Blokker retail chain, a ample majority of its independent franchisees have opted to abandon the brand name, choosing instead to pursue alternative business models. Of the 36 independent branch holders,only 12 have agreed to continue operating under the Blokker banner. The remaining 24 have severed ties and will no longer be permitted to use the Blokker brand name.

The decision comes as Blokker, a household goods retailer founded in 1896, attempts a comeback after declaring bankruptcy in November. The companyS financial struggles were attributed to mounting debts, including tax liabilities exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, and a decline in store turnover, partly due to increased competition.

Entrepreneur Roland Palmer, associated with blokker-Log, spearheaded the restart initiative. Recent months have seen the gradual re-establishment of the Blokker presence, with the old logo reappearing on storefronts and a renewed focus on household items, mirroring the company’s past product strategy.

Prior to its bankruptcy, blokker operated approximately 400 stores nationwide. The current iteration of the chain, under Palmer’s leadership, comprises a significantly smaller footprint. According to Palmer, the remaining stores are those that previously demonstrated strong performance.

The departure of the franchisees leaves Blokker with fewer than fifty branches post-restart. A spokesperson for Blokker expressed a degree of satisfaction with the outcome, stating, “You start at zero franchisees and then you have to see who is joining. That everyone would do that is a utopia. That decision is for every entrepreneur. Twelve we find a good number. That the rest does not want is a shame.”

Reports indicate that some of the independent shop owners who have left Blokker are transitioning to the competing retailer Marskramer. Others are exploring the possibility of forming an independent cooperative to continue their operations.

July 16, 2025 0 comments

News

Reuters X account blocked in India due to legal demand

by Emma Walker – News Editor July 6, 2025

written by Emma Walker – News Editor

The official X account of international news agency Reuters has been restricted in India following a “legal demand.” So far, Reuters has not issued a statement clarifying the reason behind the blocking of its account.

Reuters is the news and media division of Thomson Reuters. The company says it employs 2,600 journalists in over 200 locations. The X account of Reuters World was also inaccessible as of 11:40 pm on Saturday.

The main handle of Reuters remains inaccessible as of 11:30 pm, saying, “@Reuters has been withheld in IN in response to a legal demand,” News 18 reported.

Despite the main @Reuters X account being blocked in India, several affiliated handles remain accessible. These including Reuters Tech News, Reuters Fact Check, Reuters Pictures, Reuters Asia and Reuters China.

According to X, many countries, including the US, have laws that may apply to posts and/or X account content.

“In our continuing effort to make our services available to people everywhere, if we receive a valid and properly scoped request from an authorized entity, it may be necessary to withhold access to certain content in a particular country from time to time,” X wrote.

X guidelines also state that content can be withheld if X was compelled to withhold it in response to a valid legal demand, such as a court order. They can also be blocked on the basis of local laws in response to a report filed through specific support intake channels.

It added, “Such withholdings will be limited to the specific jurisdiction that has issued the valid legal demand or where the content has been found to violate local law(s).”

The block appears to be country-specific as the account is still accessible from other regions.

It is not yet known whether the block is temporary or permanent, or whether it is linked to a specific report or legal order issued against the platform.

July 6, 2025 0 comments

Technology

Snapchat Blocking & Deleting Friends: What’s Happening?

by Rachel Kim – Technology Editor June 30, 2025

written by Rachel Kim – Technology Editor

How to Re-Add a Blocked or Deleted friend on Snapchat in 2025

Table of Contents

How to Re-Add a Blocked or Deleted friend on Snapchat in 2025

Have you accidentally blocked a friend or are trying to reconnect with someone who deleted their Snapchat account? Re-adding friends on Snapchat requires a few specific steps, whether they’ve blocked you or deactivated their profile.Here’s how to navigate the process in 2025.

Re-Adding a Blocked Friend

If you’ve blocked someone on Snapchat and want to re-add them, the process is straightforward. First, you need to unblock them through your Snapchat settings. Then, search for their username and send a new friend request. The key is that the friend must accept your request to restore communication.

Did You Know? Snapchat boasts over 750 million monthly active users worldwide as of Q1 2024,highlighting its continued popularity[[1].

Steps to Re-Add a Blocked Friend:

Remove the friend from your block list in Snapchat settings.
Search for the friend by their username.
Send a new friend request.
Wait for the friend to accept your request.

Re-Adding a Friend Who Deleted Their Account

When a friend deletes their Snapchat account, the situation is a bit different. The deleted account may still appear in Snapchat temporarily. You should periodically check to see if the account becomes available again. If the account is permanently deleted, you won’t be able to add them until they reactivate it.

Pro Tip: Regularly check Snapchat to see if a deleted account reappears, especially if you know the person might reactivate it.

What to Do When a Friend Deletes Their Account:

Understand that the account might still be visible temporarily.
Check Snapchat periodically to see if the account becomes available.
If the account is permanently deleted, wait until the friend reactivates it.

Additional Details

If you’ve simply removed a friend from your friends list without blocking them, the process is even easier. Just search for their username and send a new friend request. Once they accept, you can send Snaps, chat, and view their stories again.

After unblocking someone, you always have to manually re-add them. Snapchat does not automatically restore the connection.

Snapchat Friend Management: Key Facts

Scenario	Action required	Outcome
Blocked Friend	Unblock, send new request	Communication restored upon acceptance
Deleted Account	Wait for reactivation	Re-add when account is active
Removed Friend	Send new request	Communication restored upon acceptance

Understanding Snapchat’s Friend System

Snapchat’s friend system is designed to give users control over their connections. Blocking someone prevents them from contacting you or seeing your content. Removing someone simply takes them off your friend list, but they can still send you a friend request. Deleting an account removes the user from the platform, but there may be a delay before the account is fully removed from snapchat’s systems.

Snapchat is a popular platform for chatting with friends [[3]]. You can also use Snapchat on the web [[1]].

Frequently Asked Questions

Why can’t I find a friend on Snapchat?

There are several reasons why you might not be able to find a friend on Snapchat.They may have blocked you, deleted their account, or changed their username. Double-check the username and ensure you haven’t been blocked.

How long does it take for a deleted Snapchat account to disappear completely?

The exact timeframe varies, but a deleted Snapchat account may remain visible for a short period before being fully removed from the platform. This can range from a few days to a few weeks.

Can I see if someone has blocked me on Snapchat?

If someone has blocked you on Snapchat, you won’t be able to find them in search, and you won’t be able to send them Snaps or messages. Their name will disappear from your chat history.

What happens when I remove a friend on Snapchat?

When you remove a friend on Snapchat, they are removed from your friend list, and you are removed from theirs. However, they can still send you a friend request again.

Is there a limit to how many friends I can have on Snapchat?

Snapchat does not publicly disclose a specific limit to the number of friends you can have. However, having an excessively large number of friends may impact the app’s performance.

Have you successfully re-added a friend on Snapchat using these tips? What other Snapchat tricks do you find helpful? Share your experiences and questions in the comments below!

June 30, 2025 0 comments

Business

Napster Italy: SIAE Darkening Request Rejected by AGCOM

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com June 11, 2025

written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Napster Copyright Dispute: SIAE’s Ban Request Rejected by AGCOM

Table of Contents

Napster Copyright Dispute: SIAE’s Ban Request Rejected by AGCOM

Italy’s Communications authority, AGCOM, has rejected a request from SIAE, the Italian society of authors and publishers, to ban the music platform Napster over alleged copyright infringements. The decision, announced this week, comes after SIAE presented evidence of protected songs being accessible on Napster, prompting AGCOM to launch an investigation in March. AGCOM ultimately steadfast that the reported violations constituted a “negligible part” of Napster’s overall legal catalogue, leading to the archiving of the case.

AGCOM’s Decision: A Balanced Approach to Copyright Enforcement

The core of AGCOM’s decision rested on the assessment that a complete ban of Napster would be an excessive measure, given the limited scope of the alleged copyright infringements. While acknowledging the presence of some violations, the authority emphasized the importance of maintaining a balance between protecting copyright holders and ensuring access to legal online content.This decision reflects a broader debate surrounding online copyright enforcement, notably the methods and tools used to combat piracy.

Did You Know? Napster, originally launched in 1999, revolutionized music sharing but faced significant legal challenges due to copyright concerns. It has as relaunched as a legitimate music streaming service.

The Piracy Shield Debate: Alternative Enforcement Mechanisms

Notably, the Napster case was handled through an ordinary procedure involving manual evaluation, rather than utilizing AGCOM’s dedicated platform for combating online piracy, known as Piracy Shield. This choice has sparked criticism, particularly from AGCOM Commissioner Elisa Giomi, who has repeatedly raised concerns about the costs, lack of independent oversight, and potential for flawed decisions associated with Piracy shield. According to a report by *AGI*,the Piracy Shield platform has faced scrutiny over its effectiveness and transparency since its implementation ^[1].

The debate surrounding Piracy Shield underscores the complexities of online copyright enforcement. While such platforms aim to swiftly address copyright infringements, concerns remain about their potential impact on legitimate content and the need for robust safeguards to prevent errors or abuse.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) highlights the importance of balanced measures in its 2023 report on online copyright infringement ^[2].

key Considerations in AGCOM’s Assessment

The extent of copyright violations relative to the platform’s legal offerings.
The potential impact of a complete ban on users and the broader digital ecosystem.
The availability of alternative enforcement mechanisms and their associated risks.

Implications for Napster and the Future of Copyright Enforcement

While AGCOM’s decision provides Napster with a reprieve from an immediate ban, the platform remains under scrutiny. The authority has indicated that further measures may be taken if future investigations reveal more substantial copyright infringements.This case serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in balancing copyright protection with the accessibility and innovation of online platforms.

The decision also highlights the need for continued dialog and collaboration between copyright holders, online platforms, and regulatory bodies to develop effective and equitable solutions for combating online piracy. As digital technologies evolve, so too must the strategies and tools used to protect intellectual property rights while fostering a vibrant and accessible online habitat.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about evolving copyright laws and regulations to ensure compliance and avoid potential legal issues.

Timeline of Events

Date	Event
1999	Napster is launched, revolutionizing music sharing.
March 2024	SIAE reports Napster to AGCOM for alleged copyright violations.
January 2024	AGCOM rejects SIAE’s request to ban Napster, archiving the case.

What are your thoughts on AGCOM’s decision? How can online copyright be effectively protected without stifling innovation?

Evergreen Insights: The Evolution of Napster and Online Music Sharing

napster’s initial rise and subsequent legal battles marked a turning point in the history of online music distribution.Its peer-to-peer file-sharing technology, while innovative, raised fundamental questions about copyright law and the rights of artists and copyright holders. The Napster saga paved the way for the development of legitimate music streaming services,such as Spotify and Apple Music,which offer users access to vast libraries of music through subscription models.

The ongoing debate surrounding online copyright enforcement reflects the tension between protecting intellectual property rights and fostering innovation and access to information. As technology continues to evolve, finding a enduring balance between these competing interests remains a critical challenge for policymakers, copyright holders, and online platforms alike.

Frequently Asked Questions About Napster and Copyright

What is copyright infringement?: Copyright infringement is the use of copyright-protected works without permission from the copyright holder. This can include reproducing,distributing,displaying,or creating derivative works from copyrighted material.
How does copyright law apply to online platforms?: Copyright law applies to online platforms in the same way it applies to customary media. Platforms are responsible for ensuring that their users do not infringe on copyright laws and may be held liable for copyright infringement committed by their users.
What are the penalties for copyright infringement?: Penalties for copyright infringement can vary depending on the severity of the infringement and the jurisdiction. They may include monetary damages, injunctions, and criminal charges.
How can I avoid copyright infringement?: To avoid copyright infringement, always obtain permission from the copyright holder before using copyrighted material. You can also use royalty-free or Creative commons licensed content, which allows for certain uses without permission.
What is fair use?: Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows for the limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Share this article and join the discussion! What steps shoudl be taken to protect copyright in the digital age? Subscribe for more updates on technology and legal news.

June 11, 2025 0 comments

World

Trump & US Military: Domestic Deployment Concerns

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com June 10, 2025

written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Trump’s Deployment of Marines to Los Angeles Sparks Legal Clash

Table of Contents

Trump’s Deployment of Marines to Los Angeles Sparks Legal Clash

California Governor Gavin Newsom is accusing President Trump of “directing the US army against US citizens” following the deployment of Marines and the National Guard to Los Angeles. The deployment aims to manage protests related to massive raids targeting migrants. Newsom,along with Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass,is resisting what they view as the militarization of their city.

California Officials File Emergency Motion

Governor Newsom and Mayor bass have initiated an emergency motion to block the deployment, arguing it is an illegal overreach of federal power. The motion asserts that using the military for domestic law enforcement violates fundamental principles.

Did You Know? The Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits the use of the U.S. military for domestic law enforcement purposes, with certain exceptions.

Newsom stated, “Trump is returning to the US army against US citizens; the courts must immediately block these illegal decisions.” the emergency motion emphasizes that law enforcement in the United States is the responsibility of the police, not the military.

Legal Basis for California’s Opposition

The emergency motion filed by California officials highlights the principle that law enforcement shoudl be carried out by police, not the military. They argue that deploying the military on American streets undermines civil society and the rule of law.

The motion states, “In the United States, it is indeed the Police – not the Army – that enforces the law.This fundamental principle dates back to the foundation of the country, is reflected in the laws of Congress and constitutes the core of our civil society. Ours is a nation of laws, which apply through an impartial justice, and not governed by military decrees.”

president Trump’s Rationale

President Trump has acknowledged that his current actions differ from his past approach, where he waited for governors to request federal assistance.He stated that he is aware he is not acting “according to the rules” as he had in the past.

Pro Tip: Understanding the nuances of federal-state cooperation during crises can provide valuable context to these events.

Financial Implications of the Deployment

According to the Department of Defense, the deployment of Marines to Los Angeles is estimated to cost the Pentagon $134 million. This figure underscores the significant financial resources being allocated to this operation.

Deployment Costs
Item	Cost
Total Deployment Cost	$134 Million

Background and Context

The Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in 1878, generally prohibits the use of the U.S. military for domestic law enforcement purposes. There are exceptions, such as in cases of natural disaster or civil unrest when authorized by law. the deployment of federal troops to manage protests has historically been controversial, raising concerns about federal overreach and the militarization of civilian spaces.Recent data from the Pew Research Center indicates that public opinion is divided on the appropriate use of federal troops in response to local unrest, with significant differences based on political affiliation.
Cornell Law – Posse Comitatus Act.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the deployment of Marines to Los Angeles controversial?

The deployment is controversial as it raises concerns about the militarization of domestic law enforcement and potential violations of the Posse Comitatus Act.

What are the potential legal challenges to Trump’s actions?

Legal challenges may focus on whether the deployment exceeds presidential authority and violates constitutional limits on the use of the military for domestic purposes.

What are your thoughts on the deployment of federal troops in response to local protests? how should the balance between federal and state authority be managed in such situations?

disclaimer: This article provides news and information and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with a legal professional for advice tailored to your specific situation.

Share your thoughts in the comments below and subscribe to world-today-news.com for more updates!

June 10, 2025 0 comments

Newer Posts

Older Posts