Roy suryo Questioned by Police in Diploma Dispute Involving President Jokowi
Table of Contents
Jakarta – Former minister of Youth and Sports Roy Suryo underwent questioning by investigators with teh Jakarta Metropolitan Police on wednesday, August 20, 2025, concerning allegations of slander related to President Joko Widodo’s academic qualifications. Suryo maintains his innocence, asserting he has committed no wrongdoing.
Inquiry Details
“Yes, I am confident I have done nothing wrong,” Suryo stated to reporters at the Jakarta Metropolitan police headquarters. “If anyone is at fault, it would be those presenting a diploma and thesis that are 99.9% suspect.”
Suryo indicated he did not present any materials during the examination, believing the accusations against him to be unfounded. He characterized the report filed against him as “wrong, silly, and full of mistakes.”
Alongside suryo, Kurnia Tri Royani and Rizal Fadillah were also questioned as part of the initial investigation phase. Legal counsel Ahmad Khozinudin confirmed this was the first examination at the investigation level, following prior questioning at an earlier stage.
The Allegations and Legal Framework
President Jokowi filed a report alleging slander concerning claims of a falsified diploma. The complaint cites articles 310 and 311 of the indonesian Criminal Code, alongside articles 27A, 32, and 35 of the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE). These laws address defamation and the misuse of electronic information.
Initially, four reports related to the case progressed to the investigation stage, while two were later dismissed. A parallel investigation was also conducted by the Criminal Investigation Police (Bareskrim), which concluded that President jokowi’s diploma was authentic and consistent with verified records.
Previous Examination of Evidence
President Jokowi himself was previously examined on July 24th at the Solo City Police headquarters. Investigators seized his high school and undergraduate diplomas for forensic analysis to verify their authenticity.
Did You Know? The ITE Law has been a subject of debate in Indonesia, with concerns raised about its potential to stifle freedom of expression.
Timeline of Events
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| July 24, 2025 | president Jokowi examined at Solo City Police; diplomas seized for forensic analysis. |
| August 20, 2025 | Roy Suryo, Kurnia Tri Royani, and Rizal fadillah questioned by Jakarta Metropolitan Police. |
What impact will this investigation have on the public discourse surrounding academic credentials and political figures?
Pro Tip: Understanding the nuances of Indonesian law, particularly the ITE Law, is crucial for interpreting the legal implications of this case.
Context and Background
This case unfolds against a backdrop of heightened political scrutiny in Indonesia.Allegations of false credentials have become increasingly common during election cycles, frequently enough fueled by social media and online disinformation campaigns. The investigation highlights the challenges of balancing freedom of speech with the need to protect individuals from defamation and maintain public trust in institutions.
Frequently Asked questions
- What is Roy Suryo’s role in this case? Roy Suryo is a former government official who is being investigated for allegedly spreading false information about President Jokowi’s diploma.
- What laws are being cited in the complaint? Articles 310 and 311 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, and Articles 27A, 32, and 35 of the Law on Information and electronic Transactions (ITE).
- Has president Jokowi’s diploma been verified? Yes,an investigation by Bareskrim concluded that President Jokowi’s diploma is authentic.
- What is the ITE law? The ITE Law regulates electronic information and transactions in Indonesia and has provisions related to defamation and online content.
- What is the potential penalty for slander in Indonesia? Penalties for slander can include imprisonment and fines, depending on the severity of the offense and the specific laws violated.
We will continue to follow this developing story and provide updates as they become available. Do you have thoughts on this case? Share your viewpoint in the comments below!
