Home » Technology » Apple Alleges Massive Vision Pro Secrets Theft

Apple Alleges Massive Vision Pro Secrets Theft

Apple Accuses Ex-Engineer of Stealing Vision Pro Secrets

Former Employee Allegedly Downloaded Sensitive Data Before Joining Snap

In a recent lawsuit, **Apple** alleges that a former engineer, **Di Liu**, pilfered a vast amount of confidential information before departing to work for rival company **Snap**. This incident raises significant concerns regarding the protection of intellectual property within the rapidly expanding augmented reality market.

The complaint, submitted to the Santa Clara County Superior Court on June 24th, claims **Liu** resigned under the pretense of family and health issues. However, just three days prior to his departure, he reportedly used his credentials to acquire thousands of documents from **Apple’s** systems. These documents reportedly contained details about the **Apple** Vision Pro.

According to the filing, the documents covered critical aspects such as product design, quality control, cost structures, and supply-chain strategies. The files were apparently uploaded into his personal cloud storage. **Snap**, which sells Spectacles wearables, stated it is reviewing the allegations and does not believe the matter relates to the individual’s actions at **Snap**.

“Engineers with inside knowledge are vital to Apple’s AR push, and any leak could narrow its competitive edge in a fast-evolving market.”

—Source

Data breaches and intellectual property theft cost businesses billions annually; this year, losses are projected to hit $5.2 trillion (Statista).

Company Responses and Previous Legal Battles

This lawsuit is another in a line of trade-secret cases for **Apple**. Past suits include cases against a designer suspected of leaking to a journalist in 2021 and against chip startup Rivos in 2022. In 2023, federal authorities also charged a software engineer for allegedly stealing thousands of confidential files.

**Apple** shares increased 1.10% on the news, indicating investors’ focus on safeguarding intellectual property. The case further highlights the legal risks companies face when employees change employers.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.