Trump Launches ‘Board of Peace’ for gaza, Eyes Expansion to Ukraine and Venezuela
January 23, 2026 – Former U.S. President Donald Trump has announced the formation of an executive board aimed at implementing a “vision for the Board of peace” in Gaza. The initiative, which has already drawn scrutiny from international diplomats, signals a potential shift in approaches to conflict resolution and raises questions about the future role of conventional international bodies like the United Nations.
Key Personnel and Mandate
The executive board comprises a diverse group of individuals with experience in diplomacy,growth,infrastructure,and economic strategy. Members include U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Marc Rowan, Ajay Banga, and Robert gabriel.According to a White House statement, each member will oversee a specific portfolio crucial for the long-term stabilization and success of Gaza.
These portfolios encompass a broad range of areas, including strengthening governance capabilities, fostering regional relations, overseeing reconstruction efforts, attracting investment, securing large-scale funding, and mobilizing capital. The initiative aims to move beyond immediate humanitarian aid and focus on building a enduring future for the region.
Nickolay Mladenov Appointed as High Representative
To ensure effective on-the-ground coordination, former United Nations Special Envoy for the Middle East Peace process (2015-2020) and former Bulgarian Foreign Minister, Nickolay mladenov, has been appointed as the High Representative for Gaza. Mladenov will serve as the primary liaison between the Board of Peace and a 15-member Palestinian technical committee, facilitating communication and collaboration between the international body and local stakeholders.
The united States has reaffirmed its commitment to supporting this transition framework, pledging to work closely with Israel, key Arab nations, and the international community to achieve the goals of the overarching plan. The White House statement emphasizes the need for full cooperation from all parties with the National Contingency Action Group (NCAG), the Board of Peace, and the international stabilization Force to ensure the swift and effective implementation of the plan. Further appointments to the board are expected in the coming weeks.
Expanding the Scope: Ukraine and Venezuela
Beyond Gaza, Trump is reportedly considering expanding the scope of the ‘Board of Peace’ to address other global hotspots, including Ukraine and Venezuela. This potential expansion, first reported by the Financial Times, has sparked concerns among Western and Arab diplomats who question the appropriateness of granting the nascent body a mandate extending far beyond the Middle East.
Sources within the trump administration suggest the ‘Board of Peace’ is envisioned as a potential option to the united Nations, offering a non-official, parallel mechanism for addressing conflicts worldwide. This viewpoint reflects a growing dissatisfaction with the perceived inefficiencies and political constraints of the UN system.
Criticism and Concerns
The proposed expansion has been met with skepticism. Critics argue that a body operating outside the established framework of international law and diplomacy could undermine existing efforts to resolve conflicts and potentially exacerbate tensions. Concerns have also been raised about the lack of transparency and accountability surrounding the Board of Peace’s operations and decision-making processes.
The success of the initiative will depend on its ability to garner broad international support and build trust with all stakeholders involved. Navigating the complex political landscapes of Gaza, Ukraine, and Venezuela will require a nuanced and collaborative approach, one that prioritizes inclusivity and respects the sovereignty of all nations.
Implications for International Diplomacy
The creation of the Board of Peace represents a potentially critically important development in the landscape of international diplomacy. If successful, it could offer a new model for conflict resolution, one that is more agile and responsive to the needs of affected populations. However, its success hinges on overcoming the challenges of legitimacy, transparency, and inclusivity. The world will be watching closely to see whether this unconventional approach can deliver tangible results and contribute to a more peaceful and stable future.
