Home » Technology » Expensive Batteries Hide Cheap Tricks

Expensive Batteries Hide Cheap Tricks

by Rachel Kim – Technology Editor

expensive Batteries Hide ‍Cheap Tricks

The trend of​ locked-down electronics and software is increasingly common‍ across industries, contributing​ to a cycle ‍of consumerism. While major players​ like automotive manufacturers and tech companies are ⁤well-known for‌ this practice,⁢ some lesser-known companies are also adopting similar strategies. Recent analysis of Milwaukee M18⁢ batteries suggests a potential cost-cutting measure impacting long-term performance.

as ⁣demonstrated ⁤in a video by Tool Scientist, Milwaukee battery packs may not actively balance the individual cells within the pack. Battery balancing ‍is a crucial ⁣process that ensures all cells reach the same state of charge, ‍maximizing battery life and capacity. While the battery management system (BMS) microcontroller is connected to each cell, ​data suggests this connection is used for status reporting rather than ⁤active balancing.

[Tool Scientist] rigorously tested this hypothesis. ‌They intentionally introduced an imbalance into a battery pack and monitored ‌the system thru several‍ methods: observing i2c dialogue, measuring voltage drop across a resistor expected to⁢ activate during balancing, leaving the battery on a charger for 21 days, and conducting numerous charge and discharge cycles. Despite these ​efforts,the initial imbalance persisted,leading to the⁣ conclusion that Milwaukee batteries do⁢ not appear to implement cell balancing.

It’s possible Milwaukee resolute the cost of implementing balancing ⁣outweighed‍ the benefits for the majority of ‍users. The video was published nearly a year ago, suggesting potential ⁣improvements may have‍ been⁤ made as then. However, given the increasing prevalence of revenue models focused on recurring purchases, a more critical viewpoint suggests this design choice could encourage ​users to replace⁢ batteries more frequently.This aligns with Milwaukee’s existing practices, such as making user repairs tough, as noted in a recent Hackaday‍ article (https://hackaday.com/2023/09/15/reverse-engineering-the-milwaukee-m18-redlink-protocol/). ⁤The situation echoes similar concerns raised regarding ⁤the nissan Leaf’s lack of ⁢active ‌thermal management in its battery systems (https://hackaday.com/2020/09/16/improving-more-leaf-design-flaws/).

This research was brought to light ⁣by tipster [Polykit].

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.