No New Trial Granted to Sean “Diddy” Combs as Sentencing Approaches
New york, NY – May 23, 2025 – A judge today denied Sean “Diddy” Combs’ request for a new trial in the civil lawsuit brought by ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, clearing the path for a potential sentencing phase following a $30 million settlement reached earlier this month. The ruling, delivered in Manhattan federal court, rejects Combs’ claims of newly discovered evidence and procedural errors that he argued warranted a retrial.
The decision arrives as Combs faces mounting legal pressure, including a recent raid on his homes in Los Angeles and Miami by federal authorities investigating sex trafficking allegations. While the civil case with Ventura centered on allegations of abuse and coercion, the criminal investigation broadens the scope of scrutiny on the music mogul. The denial of a new trial means the terms of the settlement – which included a dismissal of Ventura’s lawsuit with prejudice – remain in affect, preventing her from pursuing further legal action against Combs related to the claims outlined in her initial complaint.
Ventura filed her lawsuit in November 2023, alleging years of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse during their relationship, which spanned from 2007 to 2018. The complaint detailed accusations of rape, controlling behavior, and forced participation in unwanted sexual acts. Combs initially denied the allegations but ultimately agreed to the $30 million settlement on May 13, 2025, just days before a scheduled deposition.
Following the settlement, Combs’ legal team sought a new trial, arguing that evidence had emerged suggesting Ventura’s claims were fabricated or exaggerated. They also raised concerns about the handling of evidence and alleged procedural irregularities during the discovery phase. Judge Analisa Torres, however, found these arguments unpersuasive, stating that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold for granting a new trial.
The judge’s ruling does not directly address the ongoing federal investigation. Legal experts suggest that the outcome of the civil case, and any potential sentencing considerations, could influence the criminal probe. Combs’ legal team has maintained his innocence and vowed to vigorously defend him against all accusations. The next steps remain unclear, but the denial of a new trial marks a significant setback for Combs as he navigates a complex web of legal challenges.
