Home » Sport » Wardlow & Jamie Hayter Return: AEW Forbidden Door Updates

Wardlow & Jamie Hayter Return: AEW Forbidden Door Updates

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

“`html

Advertisement

Washington D.C. – In a landmark decision with far-reaching ​implications ‍for digital advertising,⁤ the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ⁤has finalized ​a sweeping ban on ⁢non-compete agreements nationwide. The ruling, announced Thursday, aims too foster ​competition and increase worker earnings by ⁤prohibiting employers from⁢ restricting ‌employees’ ability to seek work elsewhere.

The FTC estimates the new rule will increase wages by ​$300 billion per year and enable approximately 30 million Americans⁣ to⁤ have more freedom to change jobs.⁤ ‌Currently, roughly one in five U.S. workers – around 30 million people – are bound by non-compete clauses, according to the agency.

Non-compete clauses keep wages low, suppress ​new ideas, and limit ‍competition,” FTC Chair​ Lina Khan stated in a ‍press release. “today’s rule will ensure that Americans have the freedom to pursue⁣ better opportunities and earn what they deserve.”

The rule broadly prohibits employers from entering into new non-compete agreements⁢ with workers. It also invalidates existing non-compete agreements, with some exceptions for senior executives. ⁣ Specifically, the ⁢ban applies to all workers, including autonomous contractors, but ‍excludes senior executives – defined as those making at least $300,000 per year who are in policy-making ​positions.

The FTC’s action comes after years of growing scrutiny of non-compete agreements, which critics argue stifle innovation and limit economic mobility. Proponents of the agreements, typically employers, have maintained that they are⁤ necessary to protect trade secrets and investments in employee⁣ training.

The rule is expected to face legal challenges from business groups who argue‌ the FTC lacks the authority to issue such a broad ban. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has already signaled its intent to sue, ‍claiming the FTC overstepped its⁤ authority. The Chamber argues that non-competes are a legitimate business tool and that the rule will harm innovation ⁢and ‍investment.

The FTC’s authority to enact this rule stems from the‍ FTC Act,‍ which prohibits unfair⁢ methods of competition. The agency argues​ that non-compete clauses constitute an unfair method of competition becuase​ they harm workers and limit competition in the labor‌ market.

The rule will take effect ⁤120 days after ‌publication in⁤ the Federal Register. The FTC has ⁢provided guidance for employers and employees on its website,outlining the details of the‌ new rule and its implications.

advertisement

The debate surrounding non-compete⁣ agreements has intensified in recent years, ⁤with ‍several states – including California, North‌ dakota, and Oklahoma – already having laws that significantly restrict or ban their use.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.