Washington D.C. – A second attack by the U.S. military on a vessel allegedly involved in drug smuggling near venezuela is fueling a bipartisan uproar in Congress, with lawmakers from both parties questioning the legality of the action and raising concerns it may constitute a war crime.The incident, occurring after a previous attack on survivors attempting to assist those initially targeted, has prompted scrutiny of the Trump governance’s policy of authorizing lethal force against suspected narco-terrorist groups.
The controversy centers on the White House’s assertion that President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have authorized targeting presidentially designated narco-terrorist groups under the laws of war. White House spokesperson Leavitt defended the actions, stating, “President trump and secretary Hegseth have made clear that presidentially designated narco-terrorist groups may be targeted for lethal attacks under the laws of war,” and asserting the president has the authority to order such actions. Though, the administration has yet to provide concrete evidence linking the targeted vessels to terrorist organizations or demonstrating an imminent threat.
Democratic senator Tim Kaine told the Washington Post that the second attack was “a clear violation” of U.S.laws of war and international law, adding, “So if it’s true, this rises to the level of a war crime.” Republican Representative Michael R. Turner echoed these concerns, stating that such an action “would be a serious matter and clearly an illegal action.”
The escalating criticism comes as questions mount regarding the justification for the attacks. According to Sjoerd den Daas, a U.S. correspondent, evidence supporting claims that the vessels were engaged in drug smuggling has not been publicly presented in recent weeks. Den Daas reported that during a White house press briefing, officials were unable to clarify the specific threat that led to the decision to fire on the boat again.
Facing mounting pressure, President Trump distanced himself from the second attack, stating, “I wouldn’t have wanted that.” This shift in tone reflects the unusual unity emerging in Congress, where even members of Trump’s own party are expressing increased criticism of the administration’s actions. The White House maintains it is acting within its legal authority,with Leavitt stating,”The president has the authority to take them out.” Though, the administration is attempting to downplay the role of Secretary Hegseth in issuing the orders, as scrutiny of his involvement intensifies.
