Home » News » Title: Judge Dismisses Comey, James Cases Over Illegitimate Prosecutor

Title: Judge Dismisses Comey, James Cases Over Illegitimate Prosecutor

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Breaking News: Judge⁤ Dismisses Cases Against James Comey and Letitia James, Citing Invalid‌ Prosecutor Appointment

A federal judge has dismissed the indictments against former⁣ FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, ruling that the prosecutor who brought the⁤ charges, ‍Lindsey halligan,​ was​ invalidly appointed. Judge Genevieve R. Currie issued the decision after determining the Justice Department ⁤overstepped ​its authority in extending Halligan’s temporary appointment as interim U.S. ⁢attorney.

Comey‍ and James were both indicted in ⁢early October on charges ⁣of bank fraud, with Halligan solely presenting ⁤the cases ​to the grand⁢ jury and signing the indictments. Both had pleaded not guilty.

The core of the legal challenge centered on the rules governing temporary U.S. attorney appointments. ⁣Comey’s⁣ attorneys⁢ argued that Halligan’s appointment was⁤ “fatally flawed” as ​it exceeded ⁢the 120-day limit ⁤for ⁤interim appointments. They contended the clock began⁢ when​ Attorney General bondi initially appointed ⁣a temporary U.S. attorney, Siebert, and that only the district court could appoint a successor once that‍ period elapsed.

Justice Department lawyers countered that‍ the 120-day⁣ limit ⁣applied‌ “per-appointment basis,” meaning each appointment‌ triggered​ a new 120-day period.They attempted ⁢to bolster Halligan’s authority with an October order from Bondi retroactively naming her a ⁢special attorney‍ and ratifying her previous actions.

However, Judge Currie​ rejected Bondi’s retroactive appointment and ratification efforts, stating the ⁢Justice Department had not cited any legal basis ⁢for rewriting the terms of a past appointment.⁤ She warned‌ that allowing such ​a practice would open⁣ the door ⁤to‌ allowing unqualified individuals to present ⁤cases to grand juries.

“The⁣ implications of a contrary conclusion‍ are extraordinary,” ⁣Currie wrote. “It⁤ would mean the Government could ​send any‍ private citizen off the street – attorney ⁤or not – into‍ the ‍grand jury⁤ room⁣ to ⁢secure an indictment so long as the Attorney​ General gives her approval after the fact. That cannot be the⁢ law.”

The judge heard ‌arguments on Comey’s motion to dismiss alongside a similar effort by James earlier ‍this ​month. The dismissal applies to both cases, as ⁢Halligan was the sole presenter in both indictments.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.