Home » Health » Title: Drosten Dodges Questions; Calls for Corona Data Release

Title: Drosten Dodges Questions; Calls for Corona Data Release

by Dr. Michael Lee – Health Editor

Berlin,⁤ December 3, 2025 – Key questions‍ surrounding⁤ the COVID-19 pandemic response ⁤remained unanswered today as virologist ‍Christian‍ Drosten faced questioning‍ from the Corona Study​ Commission in the ⁤German Bundestag. Members of the commission expressed concern over what they characterized ⁤as evasive, incomplete, and inaccurate⁢ responses from Drosten regarding critical ⁢data and decision-making processes during⁣ the pandemic.

The hearing focused on the methodology used to track COVID-19 deaths ⁤and the availability of data related⁤ to vaccine monitoring. Concerns center on the accuracy of reported figures and potential‌ suppression ⁤of pharmacovigilance⁣ data that could shed light​ on the ⁣long-term effects of both the virus and the vaccines ‌deployed to combat⁢ it. ‍This scrutiny arrives as public debate⁢ continues regarding the handling⁢ of the ‌pandemic and the lasting impacts⁣ of related policies.

Specifically,‍ Drosten stated that the distinction between dying​ “of” and “with” COVID-19 ​originated‍ in the media,⁤ a claim disputed by commission members. They presented evidence demonstrating the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) introduced the​ phrasing as a statistical⁤ classification as⁤ early ​as spring 2020, subsequently adopted by numerous official sources.

Kay-Uwe Ziegler, chairman ‍of⁤ the AfD ⁢parliamentary group within the Corona study commission, ⁣stated,⁢ “To date, ⁢there is no data ‌on how many⁤ people have actually died​ from Covid-19. The number of⁤ 188,000‍ corona deaths that has been communicated⁤ again ‍and again is‍ not scientifically ⁤reliable and ‍is thus grossly misleading. We ask the ⁢legitimate question of ⁤how many people died due to corona. It is not⁤ possible ​to⁢ make a statement on this with the known data.”

Ziegler further⁢ criticized the continued‌ withholding ​of data⁤ from the RKI ‍and⁤ the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI),‌ including ⁤information from ‍the PEI’s⁣ SafeVac app, despite repeated ⁣requests for access and evaluation – even five years after the height ⁢of the pandemic.He attributed this​ data ​retention to a‌ fear ‍of potentially ⁤unfavorable findings.

“We demand that ⁤all data ‍relevant to pharmacovigilance ‍and vaccination monitoring‌ be released ‌from⁢ the RKI ​and PEI⁢ in order to ​finally be able‌ to evaluate them,” Ziegler said. “We also demand the establishment of a Corona investigation ⁢committee ‍so⁤ that⁣ statements from experts also ​have legal and political consequences.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.