Home » World » Title: Aly Condemns Hanson’s Burqa Stunt, Defends Women’s Choice

Title: Aly Condemns Hanson’s Burqa Stunt, Defends Women’s Choice

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Senate Erupts ‌as Hanson Wears Burqa, Sparks Outrage and Suspension

A‌ heated exchange in the Australian Senate led to the⁢ suspension of One nation Senator Pauline Hanson after she entered​ the chamber wearing a burqa. The move, intended as‍ a demonstration against the garment, was widely condemned ‌as ⁤racist and disrespectful.

The ‌incident began during a voting session. Acting Senate President Slade Brockman allowed⁤ the vote to⁣ proceed despite objections from several senators regarding Hanson’s ⁣attire. ‍Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi,⁢ a Muslim, directly accused Hanson‌ of racism and Islamophobia, stating,⁤ “Dress‌ code might be the choice of the senators but racism should not be the choice of the ⁤Senate.” ‍Senator Fatima ⁣Payman, ​also Muslim, called the situation “disgraceful” and “unconstitutional,” ⁢arguing​ Hanson was disrespecting‌ the‌ Muslim faith.

Other senators, including Greens leader Larissa Waters and⁤ Lidia Thorpe, called for Hanson⁣ to be removed or⁢ for the⁣ Senate to be⁣ suspended, urging a reconsideration of Brockman’s initial ruling that dress was a⁣ matter ⁣of individual conscience. Waters argued Hanson’s actions were “extremely racist and unsafe” and a “middle finger to ‌people of faith.”

Senate President⁤ Sue Lines afterward arrived and ordered Hanson to​ leave the chamber,‍ citing ⁤a previous ruling prohibiting the use of religious ‍dress as a prop, deeming it disrespectful to parliament. Hanson refused to comply, both ‍refusing to remove the burqa and leave the chamber.

A motion⁤ by Labor Senator Penny Wong​ to suspend Hanson from the ‌Senate was then passed by a majority vote. One Nation senators challenged the ruling and ‌demanded a division, prolonging⁢ the disruption. Ultimately, the⁢ Senate was suspended ⁣following a second motion ⁤by Wong.

Following her ejection, hanson ‌stated⁤ she had been ​prevented from introducing a ⁣bill to⁤ ban the burqa in Australia, framing the incident as a suppression of public ⁢debate. She argued a ban was a matter of⁣ national‌ security and women’s rights,‍ claiming many women are forced to​ wear the garment.

Outside the chamber, conservative Senator Matt Canavan described Hanson’s actions as “inappropriate” and “disrespectful” to ​Muslim Australians. He stated he left the ‌chamber during the event, characterizing it as “attention-seeking”⁤ and arguing it undermined her⁤ arguments and cheapened the‌ Parliament. He affirmed the ability to⁣ discuss immigration and ⁣integration without ‍resorting to such tactics.

The incident has ⁣ignited debate‌ surrounding religious expression, ‌cultural sensitivity, and ⁢appropriate conduct within the Australian Parliament.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.