reaction

Russia Disputes ⁤UN Aviation ⁣Body Ruling on ‌Downed⁢ Boeing ⁣Over Ukraine

THE HAGUE, Netherlands ⁤ – Russia is formally challenging a decision by the International ‍Civil Aviation ⁤Organization (ICAO) that found it responsible for⁤ the downing of⁢ Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over eastern⁤ Ukraine in 2014. The challenge was ⁣lodged at the International Court of ‌Justice (ICJ) in The ​Hague, escalating ⁢the international legal battle surrounding ‌the disaster that ⁣killed all 298 people on board.

The ICAO ruled in 2020 that Russia violated international ⁢aviation regulations by failing to‍ prevent the placement​ of a Buk​ missile⁣ system in the‌ conflict zone,which investigators ⁤say was used⁢ to shoot down the‌ Boeing‍ 777. Russia’s appeal to the ICJ argues the ICAO exceeded its authority​ and lacked jurisdiction in the case, framing the issue as a political dispute rather than a violation of aviation law. This ⁣legal maneuver⁢ comes as the⁢ Netherlands and Australia pursue⁢ separate criminal trials against‍ individuals suspected of ​involvement in the tragedy, including a recent life sentance handed‍ down to ⁣Igor Strelkov and‌ two others by a Dutch court.

The case​ centers on allegations that ⁢Russia provided the missile system to pro-Russian separatists‌ in the Donbass region of Ukraine, who were engaged in fighting with Ukrainian ‍forces at the time of the crash. International investigators concluded the missile was ⁣launched from territory controlled by the ‌separatists. Russia has consistently denied any direct involvement,⁣ claiming‍ the investigation⁤ was biased and lacked sufficient evidence. The‌ ICJ’s consideration​ of‌ Russia’s challenge coudl⁢ take⁣ years,and its ruling will be legally binding ‍on both ​parties. The outcome will have ‍critically​ important implications for‍ international aviation law and the accountability of states for⁣ actions taken within conflict zones.

Medvedev Threatens to Renegotiate ‍WWII​ Border Treaty⁤ with Finland, ‍citing ⁢NATO Expansion

Moscow – Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council, has threatened to abandon Russia’s post-World War II settlement with Finland, accusing Helsinki of aligning with NATO to ‍prepare ⁣for potential attacks ‌on Russian territory. ‌In ⁣a statement⁢ published by TASS on​ June‍ 20, 2024, Medvedev ⁤asserted Russia has “every legal right” to revise the⁣ agreement.

The comments⁢ echo rhetoric from ⁣Vladimir Putin prior ‌to‍ the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, where he argued Ukraine could become a staging ground for strikes against Russia if it joined NATO. The⁤ Kremlin continues to⁤ frame its actions⁢ in Ukraine as⁣ a “preventive ⁣response” to‌ Western aggression.

Medvedev’s statement comes ‌amid increased ​Russian military activity near⁢ its borders with NATO members. In June ⁢2024, Finnish ‌media ⁢outlet Yle ​reported ⁤satellite imagery revealed expansion of Russian military infrastructure near ⁣the finnish border. The Wall Street Journal reported in april 2024 that Russia was deploying ⁣new equipment and troops to bases ‍along its NATO border, demonstrating⁢ a capacity to continue its‍ war in Ukraine while concurrently strengthening its forces⁣ along the⁢ Finnish border.

Further signaling a heightened perception ⁤of threat, ⁢an article published in February 2024 by the Russian Foreign Ministry journal International Affairs urged ⁣Moscow to consider the Baltic Sea a “potential theater of military operations.” Author Nikolai Mezhevich claimed that Baltic and northern european countries, including Finland, ‍were creating a‌ “grey zone” in the Baltic Sea.