Skip to content
World Today News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • World
World Today News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • World
Friday, December 5, 2025
World Today News
World Today News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • World
Copyright 2021 - All Right Reserved
Home » presidential debate » Page 2
Tag:

presidential debate

Alternate of accusations in opposition to leaders of Morena, PRI and PAN because of insecurity
World

Alternate of accusations in opposition to leaders of Morena, PRI and PAN because of insecurity

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com May 22, 2024
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

The presidential candidates confronted one another over the safety methods utilized each in Felipe Calderón’s six-year time period and within the present one, and within the launch of accusations, they reached leaders of Morena, PRI, PAN and opposition governors.

Gallery: Candidates go face to face within the final presidential debate

Within the second block of the third debate, the usual bearer of Fuerza y ​​Corazón por México, Xóchitl Gálvez, defined why she calls Claudia Sheinbaum a “narco candidate” and Morena, a “narco get together”, regardless of the willpower of the INE Complaints Fee , which ordered these expressions to be faraway from the second debate.

He identified that the chief of Morena, Mario Delgado, is beneath investigation by United States safety businesses for having “colluded with Sergio Carmona, linked to organized crime,” and in response, Claudia Sheinbaum, candidate of the Let’s preserve making historical past coalition, advised him He recalled that “the PRIAN has extra fugitive governors than these in workplace.”

In the meantime, the usual bearer of the Citizen Motion, Jorge Álvarez Máynez, questioned Gálvez for declaring that he has the character to confront criminals “if he has them within the prime positions of the multi-member lists of the PRI and the PAN”, in reference to the nationwide leaders of these events. “These are the true criminals,” he burdened.

Sheinbaum recalled that Felipe Calderón “made probably the most horrible selections within the nation, the struggle in opposition to medicine, which suggests permission to kill, and put in cost a sinister character, (Genaro) García Luna, right now imprisoned in america. ”. That struggle, he acknowledged, “didn’t change a lot with (Enrique) Peña Nieto,” till “President Andrés Manuel López Obrador arrived and altered the coverage from declaring struggle to constructing peace.”

Álvarez Máynez additionally criticized the murder charge that was recorded on the finish of the six-year phrases of Calderón and Peña Nieto and questioned that the present authorities, “which promised a brand new technique, didn’t change it, adopted militarism.” He claimed to be the one one who has offered a distinct route.

Sheinbaum confirmed {a photograph} of Gálvez gassing cops. “Right here is the one individual in Mexico Metropolis who has gassed cops with sanitizer,” she defined, whereas the opposition candidate confirmed a poster with the silhouette of the Morenista asking her to cease mendacity.

Xóchitl Gálvez defined that calling Sheinbaum “narco-candidate” “is just not a nickname or an insult,” however “an outline of occasions from Anabel Hernández’s guide,” so the morenista responded that “those within the guide La reyna del are higher.” sur, by Pérez Reverte, or higher I like to recommend science fiction, Crónicas Marcianas.”

Gálvez insisted on his assaults, and in addition attacked Omar García Harfuch, “it might be essential for his tremendous police officer to inform this complete story about García Luna.”

Álvarez Máynez identified that “we’re the one ones who would not have financing from organized crime or any sort of curiosity.”

Claudia Sheinbaum insisted that the Supreme Courtroom of Justice of the Nation should commit extra to safety and proposed consolidating the Nationwide Guard, which might be nearer and in addition present safety on the roads.


#Alternate #accusations #leaders #Morena #PRI #PAN #due #insecurity
– 2024-05-22 13:59:23

May 22, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
2024 Presidential Election Debate: Ganjar Pranowo vs Prabowo Subianto on Free Internet vs Free Lunch Programs
News

2024 Presidential Election Debate: Ganjar Pranowo vs Prabowo Subianto on Free Internet vs Free Lunch Programs

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com February 5, 2024
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Jakarta –

Presidential candidate (capres) number 3, Ganjar Pranowo, and presidential candidate number 2, Prabowo Subianto, were involved in a debate over programs about free internet with free lunch. Ganjar highlighted Prabowo Subianto’s statement, which assessed that those who choose free internet over free food have slow brains.

Responding to this, Ganjar considered Prabowo’s statement to be very sadistic.

This was conveyed by Prabowo and Ganjar in the 2024 presidential election debate on Sunday (4/2/2024). Ganjar and Prabowo compared the free internet program to a free lunch.

Reward initially questioned the history of Prabowo’s statement saying that internet was free for slow brains. This statement, said Ganjar, is not in accordance with the digital ideas that Prabowo’s vice presidential candidate, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, has often promoted on many occasions.

“I have a free internet program for schools for MSMEs. But in Pontianak on January 20, you said that people who want free internet, sorry, sir, have slow brains. Your vice presidential candidate talked about IoT, digital downstreaming and many programs that have a digital theme,” said Ganjar in the debate presidential candidate at JCC Senayan, Central Jakarta, Sunday (4/2/2024).

Ganjar then asked Prabowo regarding the fact that there is a digital divide in Indonesia according to BPS data. He then asked Prabowo to explain how to resolve this problem.

“BPS said that the condition of digital inequality is very high in our area. Do you agree, sir, to improve this digital inequality and how?” Ganjar asked.

Prabowo’s response

Prabowo then answered Ganjar’s accusation about his slow brain. He considered that Ganjar did not accept it completely. Prabowo explained that free internet is good, but people need free lunch more.

“Maybe you didn’t hear what I said in full. What I said was which is more important, free internet or free food for people in need, for the poor, for lower class people,” said Prabowo.

Prabowo admitted that he did not question Ganjar’s idea regarding free internet. However, he considered that the free lunch program he initiated was more important to prioritize.

“If free internet I agree, (but) don’t free internet be more important than free food. Food is absolutely for our people. They have to eat, children have to eat, poor people have to eat. If free internet is good for digital inequality and so on, ” concluded Prabowo.

Ganjar Says Sadist

Presidential candidate number 3, Ganjar Pranowo, brought up the statement of presidential candidate number 2, Prabowo Subianto, who assessed that those who choose free internet over free food have slow brains. Ganjar considered this statement to be very sadistic.

“This is the great thing if the internet is good, sir, the digital footprint will never be lost, Mr. Prabowo, so the statement you are trying to clarify today, it seems to the public that it has passed, sir, because your question is very clear and compares that, so if we talk about people who “choose free internet, the brain, sorry, is slow, I think that statement is very sadistic,” said Ganjar during the fifth debate for the 2024 presidential election, at the JCC, Jakarta, Sunday (4/2/2024).

See the next page.

(yld/day)

2024-02-05 01:59:34


#Ganjar #Sadistic #Bringing #Prabowos #Statement #Free #Internet

February 5, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Prabowo Subianto Proposes Overseas Scholarship Program for Indonesian Doctors: 2024 Presidential Debate Discussion
News

Prabowo Subianto Proposes Overseas Scholarship Program for Indonesian Doctors: 2024 Presidential Debate Discussion

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com February 4, 2024
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Jakarta –

Presidential candidate number 2 Prabowo Subianto asked presidential candidate number 1 Anies Baswedan about the overseas scholarship program. Anies answered by considering the urgency.

Initially, Prabowo explained that currently the death rate in Indonesia was still high. This is partly because Indonesia lacks doctors.

“Mr Anies, we understand earlier, Indonesia’s death rate or life span is quite worrying. The problem is a shortage of doctors,” said on the stage of the fifth debate at the Jakarta Convention Center (JCC), Senayan, Central Jakarta, Sunday (4/2/ 2024).

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Prabowo admitted that he had a scholarship program abroad. Prabowo asked Anies whether he agreed with the program.

“Do you agree with my idea to massively send 10 thousand of our children abroad with full scholarships to study medicine, science, technology, engineering, mathematics? As an emergency measure to overcome this difficulty,” asked Prabowo.

Anies admitted that he agreed that this was to increase competence. Because competence is definitely useful.

“We agree with the principle of increasing competence, sir. Because increasing competence will be beneficial anyway,” answered Anies.

However, Anies said this was a matter of urgency. The state must talk to stakeholders.

“The issue is that we have to look at what is urgent today. And who should we talk to? Talk to stakeholders,” he said.

Anies explained that stakeholders best understand the problems in the field. They range from professional associations to activists.

“The state has the authority. But once again we have to talk about the knowledge and situation in the field with stakeholders. Who are they? Professional associations, then the Ministry of Health, regional services, activists, observers, experts,” he said.

From there, the government can later collect data. Not by jumping to conclusions about what is needed.

“Collect the data, see what is needed so that we don’t jump straight to ‘this is what is needed’,” he said.

Anies emphasized that he agreed about competency development. However, Anies believes that the elements of importance and urgency need to be considered.

“We see that competency development is good. But ensuring that it is in accordance with existing data so that what we invest can answer needs. So there is an important element, there is an element of urgency,” he explained.

(rdp/gbr)

2024 Presidential Election Debate Review

Find debate analysis for the presidential and vice presidential candidates of your choice only at detikpemilu!

2024-02-04 14:58:21


#Prabowo #asks #agree #send #thousand #scholarship #children #Anies

February 4, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Presidential Debate Clash: Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar vs Prabowo Subianto Ethical Controversy
News

Presidential Debate Clash: Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar vs Prabowo Subianto Ethical Controversy

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com January 9, 2024
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Presidential candidate number 3 Ganjar Pranowo (center) clashes ideas with presidential candidate number 1 Anies Baswedan and presidential candidate number 2 Prabowo Subianto during the presidential candidate debate at Istora Senayan, Jakarta, Sunday (7/1/2024). The third debate for the 2024 presidential election, which was attended by the three presidential candidates, had the theme of defense, security, geopolitics, international relations and foreign policy.

REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, JAKARTA — The winning National Team (Timnas) Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar ‘AMIN’ stated that they would not take the statement of presidential candidate number 2 seriously Prabowo Subianto who satirized Anies by saying the word “stupid”. The AMIN national team admitted that they were used to various attacks from outside parties against AMIN, so they chose to ignore them.

“Pak Anies and Gus Muhaimin were attacked not only personally, from the very beginning lahis being obstructed,” said AMIN National Team Assistant Coach Jazilul Fawaid to reporters, Tuesday (9/1/2024).

Jazilul actually turned the word “stupid” against Prabowo. According to the Deputy Chairperson of the National Awakening Party (PKB), Anies’ question was neutral and should be responded to with an answer, not attacking the questioner and vilifying him.

Jazilul said it was considered unethical to convey the mocking statement to the public. According to him, Prabowo no longer cares about values ​​and ethics.

“It seems like I no longer care about ethics deh, able to No can answer, every question that has a question about ethics cannot be answered, instead the final answer is ‘you No “You have the right to question ethics because you are not an ethical person,” said Jazilul.

When emphasized that he would follow up or report this to the Indonesian Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), Jazilul emphasized that there was no need to do this.

“No lah. “Those who are sane are the Javanese people say,” he stressed.

Previously, it was known that presidential candidate number 2 Prabowo Subianto was suspected of making a complete sarcasm of presidential candidate number 1 Anies Baswedan during the campaign in Pekanbaru, Tuesday (9/1/2023). Prabowo was sarcastic about the matter presidential election debate at Istora Senayan, Jakarta, on Sunday (7/1/2024).

2024-01-09 13:25:29


#Prabowo #Hes #Stupid #Hes #Angry #Touched #Land #AMIN #National #Teams #Response #Republika #Online

January 9, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Public Spotlight on 2024 Presidential Debate: Anies, Prabowo, and Ganjar’s Performance Analyzed by INDEF
News

Public Spotlight on 2024 Presidential Debate: Anies, Prabowo, and Ganjar’s Performance Analyzed by INDEF

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com January 9, 2024
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

CNN Indonesia

Tuesday, 09 Jan 2024 06:25 IWST

INDEF said that Anies Baswedan was considered an intelligent figure, Prabowo Subianto was considered firm, Ganjar Pranowo was considered to appear with intelligent answers in the debate. (ANTARA FOTO/Aditya Pradana Putra)

Jakarta, CNN Indonesia —

The Continuum Institute released public views on social media regarding the three presidential candidates at the event third debate for the 2024 presidential election on Sunday (7/1) night.

Presidential candidate number 1 Anies Baswedan is considered an intelligent figure, presidential candidate number 2 Prabowo Subianto is considered firm, while presidential candidate number 3 Ganjar Pranowo is considered to appear by giving intelligent answers.

This includes the analysis presented by Continuum INDEF Data Analyst Maisie Sagita in the public discussion “Elaborating on the presidential candidates’ ideas about geopolitics and defense” which was held by Continuum online, Monday (8/1).

First, Maisie explained that Anies received the most public attention, namely 45.7 percent. Then, Prabowo was highlighted by 36.8 percent and Ganjar was highlighted by 17.6 percent.

Even though he was the most highlighted, Anies apparently received the lowest positive sentiment among his two competitors. Meanwhile, Ganjar achieved the highest positive sentiment at 81.7 percent. Followed by Prabowo with 61.6 percent and Anies at 47.9 percent.

Furthermore, Maisie also explored what was in the public spotlight for each of the presidential candidates.

Anies Baswedan

The topics of Anies’ positive conversation were that Anies was indeed intelligent (67.94 percent), Indonesia was heading for change (18.23 percent), and his explanations were calm and insightful (13.83 percent).

“Anies is seen by the public as an intelligent person. This can be seen from his calm and insightful explanation. The public again feels enlightened by Anies’ explanation,” said Maisie in a broadcast on YouTube INDEF.

Anies is also seen by the public as a figure who can bring Indonesia towards change.

Maisie also said that her party had previously analyzed the ‘Desak Anies’ campaign strategy program which had received a positive response. He said that this program made the public see Anies as an intelligent leader because he could provide answers that were considered to provide solutions to current problems.

Meanwhile, the topic of Anies’ negative conversation in last night’s debate was that Anies was again highlighted as a figure who likes to make sweet promises.

The details of the negative topics are, namely just talking, making lots of sweet promises (59.35 percent), attacking to bring down your opponent (15.20 percent), attacking with sarcasm (10.62 percent), danger, being a horse-fight (7.03 percent). ), has no ethics (5.36 percent), and Anies’ data is wrong (2.44 percent).

Maisie explained that what the public is really worried about is that Anies’ intelligence in conveying these sweet words is just words without real action if he is elected president in the future.

“Then, one of Anies’ strategies, where he attacked other candidate pairs, also received attention. The public considered that Anies’ attack was unethical and the aim was only to bring down opponents, pitting one against another,” explained Maisie.

Prabowo Subianto

Furthermore, one of the positive topics in Prabowo’s spotlight is that the public appreciated his firmness in not wanting to reveal confidential data previously requested by Anies and Ganjar.

Maisie said that Prabowo’s determination not to reveal this confidential data was appreciated because the public felt that there was indeed confidential data that should not be disclosed to the public.

The details of the data are leaders who are firm and polite (35.52 percent), support Prabowo (30.64 percent), Prabowo’s answer is the most reasonable (13.52 percent), Prabowo’s real work is visible (11.04 percent), and data secrets must not be revealed to the public (9.29 percent).

Meanwhile, on the topic of negative discussion, Prabowo is seen as a person who gets emotional or emotional easily.

“On the negative side, Prabowo is considered too emotional,” said Maisie.

The detailed data is that you look emotional (48.76 percent), you can see who is talking without data (25.54 percent), don’t attack personally (10.38 percent), slip off, answer less (7.10 percent), don’t be anti-criticism (3.75 percent), don’t take Indonesia’s wealth (2.72 percent), and be too ambitious (1.76 percent).

Maisie also said that there were several members of the public who discussed Prabowo’s inability to reveal data when asked by other candidate pairs.

“There are two sides to disclosing this data, so there are some members of the public who feel that Pak Prabowo’s attitude of not disclosing the data is the right attitude because the data is confidential data. But on the other hand, the public also regrets that Pak Prabowo cannot show real data. “in order to be able to refute attacks from other candidate pairs. Therefore, the public felt that during last night’s debate, Pak Prabowo was unable to answer questions asked by other candidates,” said Maisie.

Ganjar Pranowo

Then, the topic of positive conversation with Ganjar was considered to be similar to Anies.

In last night’s debate, Maisie said that the public considered Ganjar to be a figure who mastered the debate theme. This, he said, can be seen from his answers which look intelligent.

The details of the data are Ganjar’s answers are intelligent (30.85 percent), choose the honest one (28.07 percent), support for a prosperous, advanced and superior Indonesia (18.27 percent), calm and firm delivery (13.81 percent), and Ganjar mastered the debate theme (8.99 percent).

“Apart from that, the public also praised Ganjar’s delivery which was considered quite calm and firm, so that what was conveyed could be well understood by the public,” said Maisie.

Meanwhile, the topic of negative discussion with Ganjar is not much different from Anies, namely it is related to the strategy of attacking his debate opponent.

“Regarding his strategy of bringing down other candidate pairs, Ganjar’s attitude is considered less than ethical and there are still other strategies that should be used,” said Maisie.

Details of the topics of negative discussion are that the debate must be ethical, don’t drop it (25.01 percent), just talk (21.89 percent), don’t corner other candidate pairs (20.98 percent), taking care of Central Java has failed (17.80 percent ), Ganjar’s answer was incoherent (7.97 percent), and Ganjar was incited by Anies (6.34 percent).

The data analyzed by Continuum came from social media YouTube and TikTok regarding the presidential candidate debate on Sunday (7/1) evening. A total of 51,344 conversations and 29,698 social media accounts were analyzed.

The details are 13,576 conversations or comments from TikTok, while the number of accounts is 11,661 accounts. Meanwhile, Continuum analyzed 37,768 conversations of three live broadcasts of presidential candidate debates from YouTube, the General Election Commission (KPU), KompasTV, and Narasi. The conversation came from 18,037 YouTube accounts.

(pop/isn)

Watch the Video Below:

2024-01-08 23:25:09


#Public #Spotlight #Debate #Anies #Ganjar #Smart #Prabowo #Firm

January 9, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Budiman Sudjatmiko Responds to Anies Baswedan’s Personal Attacks on Prabowo Subianto in 2024 Presidential Debate
News

Budiman Sudjatmiko Responds to Anies Baswedan’s Personal Attacks on Prabowo Subianto in 2024 Presidential Debate

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com January 8, 2024
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Jakarta –

Deputy Chairman of the National Campaign Team (TKN) Expert Council Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka, Budiman Sudjatmikoresponding to the third debate on the 2024 presidential election. Budiman said that presidential candidate number 1, Anies Baswedan, had many personal attacks on Prabowo Subianto.

“I see that it would be better for Mr Anies to be a personal forum. Mr Anies apparently personalizes some of the criticism which has nothing to do with the performance of the Ministry of Defense, has nothing to do with defense issues,” said Budiman at Istora Senayan, Sunday (7 /1/2024).

Budiman acknowledged that Anies had criticized Prabowo a lot. However, this criticism was considered to only focus on Prabowo’s personal issues.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“Yes, he mentioned something, but it seems that the weight of pressure conveyed by Mr. Anies was a lot of personal attacks,” he said.

Budiman assessed that Prabowo continued to answer on the right track. Prabowo considered mastering the issues presented by the moderator.

“But I am interested that Pak Prabowo is still trying to be on the right track discussing issues of defense, foreign policy, geopolitics and globalization, in his capacity not only because he is Minister of Defense but he is also a good reader, book reader, reader. newspapers, news, quite up to date,” he said.

He also assessed Ganjar’s performance on debate night. Budiman said Ganjar tried to criticize but did not know that some defense issues could not be openly disclosed to the public.

“Substantially, Pak Prabowo controls it, and if we look at the attitude of the two other candidates, Pak Ganjar tries to criticize the performance of the Ministry of Defense but doesn’t know that in various kinds of defense issues, there are things that are really sensitive and cannot be disclosed,” said Budiman.

“Regarding power, fighter aircraft, defense equipment will reveal state secrets, because defense issues are sensitive,” he concluded.

The third presidential candidate debate was held on Sunday (7/1) at Istora Senayan, Central Jakarta. The debate carried the themes of defense, security, international relations and geopolitics.

Watch DetikPagi Live:

See also Video: Rewards to Prabowo: At first I believed you understood, now I doubt it

[Gambas:Video 20detik]

(water/water)

2024 Presidential Election Debate Review

Find debate analysis for the presidential and vice presidential candidates of your choice only at detikpemilu!

2024-01-08 01:26:16


#TKN #Anies #Criticism #Presidential #Candidate #Debate #Lots #Prabowo #Personal #Attacks

January 8, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Search:

Recent Posts

  • Hepatitis B Vaccine Recommendation Changes Spark Concerns and Debate

    December 5, 2025
  • Macron denies warning Ukraine about potential US betrayal – as it happened | Europe

    December 5, 2025
  • December Supermoon: Halo & Rain Forecast

    December 5, 2025
  • Title: Michigan State Receives $401M Gift to Transform Athletics and Academics

    December 5, 2025
  • Homeland security head reveals plans to widen US travel ban to more than 30 countries | US immigration

    December 5, 2025

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Live News Feeds
  • Short Important News
  • Most Important News
  • Headlinez
  • Most Recommended Web Hosting
  • About Us
  • Accessibility statement
  • California Privacy Notice (CCPA/CPRA)
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA Policy
  • EDITORIAL TEAM
  • Links
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: contact@world-today-news.com


Back To Top
World Today News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • World
World Today News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • World
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: contact@world-today-news.com