non classifiu00e9(e)

National Gallery‘s Expansion ⁤into Modern Art ⁢Sparks ⁤Turf War with​ Tate

LONDON ⁢ – The National Gallery’s recent decision ​to significantly expand its collection beyond 1900,⁣ encompassing modern and contemporary art, represents a direct challenge to the Tate’s long-held curatorial territory and has ignited a debate over the future⁣ of Britain’s​ national art collections. The⁤ move, framed as a collaborative ⁤effort, is widely seen as a power play fueled by the National Gallery’s robust financial position-£375 million in⁢ reserves-compared to the Tate’s current deficit.

For decades, the Tate has largely defined the landscape of‌ modern art in Britain. Tate Modern, ‌in particular, experienced ‍surging visitor numbers, largely matching Tate Modern year-on-year until the pandemic, demonstrating public appetite for both historical and contemporary works. Though, ​Tate Britain, focused on British ⁢art, has faced a sustained decline in visitor numbers,‌ with⁢ its presentation of British art ‌increasingly perceived as a critical examination of colonialism that ‌some find discouraging.

The Tate’s collection evolved ‌from its 1926 inception as a showcase for French Impressionists-then‍ considered “modern foreign art”-to a post-war ⁣emphasis on modern British art, often to the⁢ exclusion of its international counterparts.This insular approach persisted until the tenure of Nicholas‌ Serota, ⁢who ‌actively sought to broaden the collection to include European and ‌American‍ contemporary art. In 1998,⁣ Serota ‍oversaw a⁤ division of the collection, creating Tate Modern and renaming the original gallery Tate Britain, a split that ultimately proved problematic.

While Tate modern ‍thrived during a‌ period of increasing ‍globalization leading ‌up to Brexit, Tate Britain struggled, with ‍some British artists hesitant to be categorized⁣ as simply “British.” ⁣This⁢ led⁢ to an‍ internal questioning of⁣ the value of prioritizing British art within a contemporary art world grappling with the legacy​ of Empire.

The National Gallery’s move signals‌ a clear ambition to become the comprehensive home for​ all art in Britain, capitalizing on the Tate’s financial vulnerabilities and a perceived⁣ weakness ‌in its curatorial direction at tate ⁢Britain.The question of how to balance historical and​ contemporary art within ⁣national collections, and ⁤the very definition of “British” versus “foreign” art, are now at the forefront of a national⁣ conversation.